OpenStreetMap-logo OpenStreetMap

E-mail-ikon Bluesky-ikon Facebook-ikon LinkedIn-ikon Mastodon-ikon Telegram-ikon X-ikon

Diskussion

Kommentar fra HannesHH skrevet 25. maj 2009 kl. 08:29

Don't worry, they just want to get proper money for newer systems I'd say. And that should be good.

Still I would like a more open system, maybe the european one will be (Galileo or what it is called).

Kommentar fra harriercoold skrevet 25. maj 2009 kl. 11:40

my GPS doesn't support galileo and in ours countries a gps is double price than europe or uSA

Kommentar fra HannesHH skrevet 25. maj 2009 kl. 15:52

Sorry, I meant the GPS maintainers probably want more money for better satellites and stuff. ;)

Kommentar fra Skippern skrevet 29. maj 2009 kl. 23:23

All the news flashes about future GPS failures are a cry for money of two reasons. GPS are pushed by alternative DPS systems such as Galileo and GLONAS, and solar-flare activity are close to peak, which seriously reduces the countability of satelite-based systems. IMO, producers of units, both handheld and larger should include support for multiple systems as well as alternative augmentation systems, such as IALA. A unit that uses several systems will have a higher possition accuracy than a unit relying on only one system, whether it is GPS, Galileo, GLONAS, or anything else.

Kommentar fra harriercoold skrevet 5. august 2009 kl. 12:23

when Galileo will be running?

Kommentar fra harriercoold skrevet 5. august 2009 kl. 12:26

The Commission's partner, the European Space Agency (Esa), is running the procurement contest with the aim of having Galileo fully operational by 2013.

Log ind for at kommentere