Logo d’OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Notes de « igor2 »

Notes soumises ou commentées par « igor2 »

Identifiant Créateur Description Créée le Dernière modification
4112900 igor2

Ez az epulet meg all? A bin saton nem latszik.

4110809 igor2

Bing sat alapjan ez inkabb kertvarosnak tunik, nem erdonek. Lehet, hogy azota epitettek ide hazakat es a terkep elavult?

4096809 igor2

Ez a Bing muholdkepeken egy hosszu sorhaznak tunik. Lehet, hogy ez csak egy bejarat? Vagy sorhaz, es az egesznek 12 a hazszama? Vagy nem sorhaz, hanem tobb kisebb egybenott haz es ez az egyik haz?

4103167 igor2

Ez az epulet all meg? 2024-ben a Bing saton nem latszik.

4112860 igor2

ez egy koz? van neve?

4718442 igor2

Aanekoskentie on this section is marked secondary; this ends abruptly in the roundabout on the east and the road goes on as tertiary.

I am not familiar with the Finnish customs on this, but as the ref number is 4 digit long, I'd expect this section, up to the the junction with 642 on the west should be tertiary.

4729181 igor2

abandoned railway, way #83912563: I can not see any of the tracks on any of the imagery.

I've tried to follow it on the sats from end to end. There are sections where brand new buildings are built and if there were any tracks they were surely removed. There are sections where I see footways/paths, and it may be there are tracks still lingering. But the bridge over the channel here is clearly missing.

I think it should be changed from abandoned to destroyed, or railway=razed or remapped as a relation over existing roads and footways or maybe just removed from the database (we should map the present, not the past, but that may make some abandoned railway sites workign from the osm database sad).

The osm wiki seems to be down, here's a reddit discussion about the topic:

https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/1g26upf/removal_of_abandoned_railway/

My vote is for tagging it razed.

4720854 igor2

I can't find this building on the MML map, or on bing aerials. Since it was added 8 years ago into the database, it's unlikely outdated aerials, more likely just an editing mistake and the building should be removed.

4078090 igor2

Ez inkabb lebetonozott parkolonak tunik a Bing legifotokon, nem zoldteruletnek.

4146892 igor2

According to wikipedia, this section of the street should be called Sumiaisraitti:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sumiaisraitti_28.jpg

Only a survey could resolve this. House numbers should be verified as well.