Hello, please read these 3 pages on the conventions of OpenStreetMap: osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I don't know if it's valuable to map these sites as anything more than a note=* on the existing element. Even if it is, you've mapped these as buildings overlapping existing houses, which is invalid.

When adding traffic signals, please add them separately from the pedestrian crossings, which are separate objects.

Hello and thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. It's good practice to use the changeset description to actually describe what you changed: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Additionally, it's good practice to save the changes in one changeset in one local area before moving somewhere else. Many OSM tools use a bounding box to determine the area that a changeset covers, and it's tough to see what's changed when it covers half of a continent.

Reverted for destructive spam, illegal sources osm.org/changeset/115062995

Please use a more descriptive changeset message: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments This one could say something like, "Deleted a redundant traffic light". However I notice that the traffic light you did map is incorrectly placed. Please read the article on traffic signals to learn how they should be placed.

Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. This change adds duplicate information: highway=traffic_signals is already tagged at the stop positions, which is accepted practice: osm.wiki/Tag:highway=traffic%20signals?uselang=en#Tag_all_incoming_ways In OpenStreetMap, we are careful to not tag things twice: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

This changeset adds a building that duplicates hotel information in the node you previously added. osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element If you've already drawn the building and added a node, you can combine the information by selecting both and pressing "C" to combine.

This change removes the "building" tag from this feature. I've restored it, but please be careful to not remove features that exist. Also see this page osm.wiki/Key:phone for how phone numbers should be formatted.

Reverted osm.org/changeset/115023031

Please see this guide for some ideas on how to write a proper changeset description: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Additionally, you might find this document useful to understand how OpenStreetMap operates as a community: osm.wiki/How_We_Map

Do not reuse nodes from unrelated objects.

Thanks for your contributions. Some notes. First of all, please use a descriptive changeset comment. See here for more information: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Second, the "name" tag should only contain the actual name of a feature. See here for more information: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things Things like the species of a tree would better go under "species" (osm.wiki/Key:species), and the tag number under "ref" (osm.wiki/Key:ref). If you really can't find a good tag to describe an object, you can use "description".

These roads don't exist in Bing imagery, which I believe to be up to date.

These roads intersect building geometry. Please double check that the building and roads actually exist as you drew them, using a more recent imagery source, like Maxar or Bing.

Also, again, DO NOT re-use OSM objects for unrelated features. A construction site can't move two blocks over and become and orchard, they are separate things.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113872314

Thanks for your contributions. When you make a change, please be sure to include a descriptive comment so that other mappers can know at a glance what changed. Read here for more information: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Are you sure about this address change? This office is not near South First Street. Also, "addr:street" is supposed to exactly match the name of the street in OSM, with no abbreviations.

Please don't reuse ways for unrelated objects.

Swamps don't just move 1000 feet over. Please delete bad data instead of making it worse.

Why did you even remove nodes from the circle, especially without re-circularizing? Also, "fix" is not an appropriate changeset message. See here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments