impiaaa's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
103301128 | over 4 years ago | Be careful with what tags you add when you choose a preset. This whole area is not one building. I've fixed it in changeset 103358175. |
103326454 | over 4 years ago | This change removes a restaurant. It has been reverted in changeset 103351615 |
103330137 | over 4 years ago | Please note that the "addr:street" tag must match the name of a nearby street exactly. |
103331744 | over 4 years ago | Please don't add duplicate information, I've told you this already. There is no need to add a node for the hotel if the building already has a "tourism=hotel" tag on it. |
102927086 | over 4 years ago | When selecting an object, scroll down to the bottom of the inspector. Here you'll see the actual tags that define an object, including keys like "building," "landuse," and "tourism." Everything above that is just a convenient way to fill out the tags. You can read more here: osm.wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3 . If you want to make a building that is a hotel, you can select the "hotel" preset, which sets the "tourism=hotel" tag, and then set which type of building it is, which sets the "building" key. In this case I've set it to "construction," adding the tag "building=construction," to say that it's a building under construction, however I did not change the preset to "building under construction," nor did I remove the "tourism=hotel" tag. For another case: If a hotel covers a large area with multiple buildings, you can draw an area that covers the plot, set "tourism=hotel," and remove any "building" tags, because the parcel itself is not a building. The buildings inside can then be drawn properly as buildings, without duplicating the information of the whole area. |
103301103 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for your contribution! For this Maproulette challenge you're expected to fix and adjust the supplied information to fit OpenStreetMap's standards. Here for example, the laundromat is actually a bit south of here; in fact, it's already been mapped. Additionally, the name should be formatted, and "addr:street" should exactly match the name of a street nearby. |
102927086 | over 4 years ago | I've fixed it for you. It's okay to add the address, but do not create both a node and a building area for the same feature. Also, buildings should be buildings (key "building"), not construction areas (key "landuse"). Buildings (key "building") and areas can both also be hotels (key "tourism"), so you don't need to have a separate, duplicate hotel point. |
102927086 | over 4 years ago | No. Add a building tag to the building and remove the duplicate information. |
102927395 | over 4 years ago | No, buildings should have building tags. There is already a surrounding construction area. If you want to specify that the building is under construction, use building=construction. |
102927395 | over 4 years ago | You deleted the building tag of this area and left a duplicate point. Please restore the tag and don't add duplicate information. |
102927086 | over 4 years ago | You deleted the building tag on this area and left a duplicate point. Please replace the tag and remove duplicate information. |
102926972 | over 4 years ago | You deleted the building tag on this area. Please replace it. |
102924835 | over 4 years ago | There are two hotels in this building. How do you know that there is only one, and why did you leave a duplicate point? |
102924443 | over 4 years ago | This is an incorrect address, and you removed the building name again. |
102793838 | over 4 years ago | sorry, changeset 102872884 |
102793838 | over 4 years ago | Reverted with changeset 102793838 |
102793838 | over 4 years ago | This removes the heritage name of the building. Please undo this change. |
102510558 | over 4 years ago | Generally it's better to use access=private than to delete something just because it's "on private property" |
102436070 | over 4 years ago | Hi! While I appreciate the enthusiasm, you should really follow the [Import Guidelines](osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines) before importing anything. The local community has a few imports in progress, and a few imports planned—including street lamps! Join one of the [Code for San Jose](https://www.meetup.com/code-for-san-jose/) meetings some time and we can help you get the import ready for proper approval. |
102189585 | over 4 years ago | Why did you remove this? Have you checked that the hotel no longer exists? If so, it may be useful to change to disused:tourism=hotel rather than deleting it. |