OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

int_ua의 일기

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2019년 10월 9일 17:36에 gileri님의 의견

This was not a light decision, and one that they would have preferred not to take. Please remain civil, that will help your voice to be heard.

2019년 10월 10일 19:37에 Zverik님의 의견

int_ua, why?

2019년 10월 11일 14:17에 int_ua님의 의견

gileri, I will remain civil, thank you. How do you know it wasn’t?

Zverik, because it wasn’t a transparent decision-making process. While there were two threads published on forums claiming to seek information it looks like not a single argument there was ever taken into account (I will not repeat them here for now), DWG just went ahead after some time without ever responding or providing arguments. Why weren’t notes published if there were no problem with the said process? To me it looks like a cover-up for deciding to appease a major “consumer” by ignoring smaller ones’ completely, possibly under influence of infiltrated agents.

To make life easier for others who have seen the discussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64206 If you don’t know Ukrainian and Russian I suggest you refrain from asking interested parties to translate for you because that may influence quality of translation, Zverik is an interested party.

2019년 10월 11일 14:19에 int_ua님의 의견

s/have seen/haven’t seen/

2019년 10월 11일 17:01에 gileri님의 의견

I want to know who is responsible and for them to be held accountable, preferrably removed from project.

That is not remaining civil. Your comment under the post is.

I don’t think OSM has any stake in this dispute, as they state in Informationfor officials and diplomats ofcountries and entities with disputed territories :

“The existence of a name, boundary location or description in the OpenStreetMapdatabase does NOT imply that that it is legally correct in any jurisdiction.”

They only made a decision to conform to a rule that was approved before this dispute.

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요