توضیح: محدودیت تردد کامیون

Hi, thanks for comment. I shared this on tagging mailing list.

به خاطر تشابهی که در نام فروشگاه‌های «لوازم خانگی خرد» و «لوازم خانگی بزرگ» ممکنه وجود داشته باشه؛ مثل این مورد یا فروشگاه آوا
node/7854978428
میخواستم این دو مورد که اطلاع دارم و همچنین سایر مواردی رو که برچسب‌های
houseware
رو به
appliance
تغییر دادین، مجدداً به
houseware
تغییر بدم. به نظر شما موردی نداره؟

سلام در مورد «کادویی و لوازم خانگی فانوس» قوری و کتری و پارچ و ظروف کوچک آشپزخانه می‌فروشه و بنا به توضیحات ویکی به نظرم برچسب
houseware
مناسب‌تر باشه از
appliance
که برای یخچال و ماشین لباس‌شویی و از این قبیل توصیه شده

سلام
چرا این محدوده‌های فضای سبز جنگلی را حذف کردین؟

osm.org/way/993345324/history
osm.org/way/993345323/history
osm.org/way/993345322/history
osm.org/way/993345321/history

سلام لطفاً طبقه‌بندی خیابان‌ها رو با اطلاع کافی تغییر بدین. برای مثال خیابان زیر پل شهید بختیاری رو
trunk
کردین که صددرصد غلطه. همچنین در سایر افزایش‌ها لزومی نمیبینم.

سلام. جاده اراک فرمهین تا یک کیلومتر بعد از فرعی به مشهدالکوبه دوبانده شده. بقیه‌اش تا عزیزآباد تک‌بانده است.

Hello, unfortunately currently I don't remember. I will get more info on this when I go there next time

Hi Andre,
This sport center is finished now. There are some photos at these links for the opening day:

https://cdn.yjc.news/files/fa/news/1401/8/4/16782065_898.jpg
https://www.borna.news/fa/tiny/news-1390741
https://www.mehrnews.com/photo/5617156/

> I adviced you to read and understand the words your using before saying it, as I do examine each single node I edit.

I'm the translator of that page in Persian.

Some examples:

you removed a wall from osm.org/changeset/126248699
because you say places are unregistered. Even removing the main features is wrong and you should add more attributes to describe the existing features. What you do with other closed map platforms that you don't have freedom like here?

Also you think mechanical:

On osm.org/changeset/120182604 you said that "بین الحرمین" is a descriptive name while I recently saw the sign of that place on a big blue board in three languages: ar, fa, en.
No need to repeat that you reverted that changeset fully, i.e. without keeping the changes that in your opinion were good.

osm.org/changeset/121515664
You removed the name:fa of Najaf airport because "it doesn't match with the name on wikidata"!

Aren't these mechanical and without use of common sense?

> head up to @osm_iraq to complain.
Why should I come to a group that a vandal "lockdownguy" invited someone to join there? Search in group for lockdownguy.

Info of Al-Kafeel university from:
osm.org/node/5692924022/history
(version 2)

> Instead of deleting the light towers that I registered, you could have added the numbers or names that the Ministry of Energy has given. The map is improved with the cooperation of all editors

Hi ChehrehBargi, I agree with you. In addition to what you said,
I see that mappers add the number of these poles in their addressing:
osm.org/node/5692924022/history
osm.org/node/6698816686
osm.org/node/4682002789
They are so useful and easy-to-use for addressing specially on long highways like this.
Probably there were more of this addressing but deleted in his massive mechanical cleanups.

Also each number is written on two separate green boards in Arabic and English scripts for example ۲۰ and 20.

Sometimes there is another single old board in white with same number that remained from past on the same pole but the green ones are newer.

I just fixed it moments ago

Hello LockOnGuy,
I copied the name from n4859177121.
Please let me know what name fits better for this sports_center and I'll fix it.
thanks

Hello LockOnGuy

I put this comment just to inform you about an edit I did on:
osm.org/way/1089391780

I added the name:fa to this feature for the 3rd time via changeset:
osm.org/changeset/125455560

Previously, you replaced geometries of this monument with new ones without keeping new attribute I added at 2 different times:
osm.org/changeset/122820265
osm.org/changeset/125304676

thanks

سلام، این تغییر نامها خرابکاریه و واگردانی میشه. قربون دستت، لطفا روی بهبود نقشه وقت بذار

again repeating same claims...

Iran only has let a few non-Iranian people to live there in peace along majority of Iranians. It doesn't mean by any means sovereignty over the land and Iran won't allow it in future, too.

> Having a disputed boundaries won't affect how existing "boundary=administrative" relations are processed."

You added the claimed border lines to administrative boundaries of UAE states and this affects boundary=administrative relations. It's simple to understand.

> These "claims" as you described them, exist in the reality

That is why we have boundary=claim.
boundary=administrative isn't same as boundary=claim.

> Lastly, if you want to edit the boundaries of Sharjah...
Why you forget yourself but advice others? You've initially drawn non real admin borders inside Iran without any discussion.

> The locals are Arabs
> they stated that they are part of the UAE,

Don't assume things simple. Iran has many Arabs that are Iranian and love their country. If you ask people in Abumusa they say their population is 85M. You know what it mean.

> just added disputed borders.
You did more by adding claimed borders to UAE-related boundaries. UAE has no control over land and borders there.
Your edits here are really useless:
- duplicating boundary=claim/disputed that existed already.
- mapping claims as reality by adding them to administrative relations.

Please leave it in peace as it was with my last edit on it, and don't impose claims into the map.

However you can suggest cartographers to make a rendering style for claims to show them on the map and you don't have to add them to administrative ones.

> imagine discussing Crimea
General rule in OSM is on the ground rule or physical control as you read the PDF from OSMF before and it follows realities on the ground too.

> just like you when you deleted the disputed borders
It seems that you missed some part of the discussion. I admitted the mistake right there in my reply to Aleksandar. If you read the discussion, you wouldn't have to complain on deleting it once there and this time here.

My problem isn't existence of claims, but turning claims into realities on the map.

And for your last statement:
Overlapping between relations of Iran and UAE, have the same meaning as overlapping between Iran and some UAE states. And you accepted to avoid it *and then* if you want start a discussion in public mailing list so others give their opinions.

خواهش میکنم. یخرده باهاشون کار کنین ایشالا قلقش دستتون میاد :)

> the grave is the main feature
OK, I can consider this as the explanation on that change.
Thanks