jleedev's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
155804244 | about 1 year ago | |
154373974 | about 1 year ago | This closed several years ago. |
154137336 | about 1 year ago | Thanks for the images! For weird changes like long term construction, I try to add detail to my own changesets explaining what's happening and when, but that's hard to do consistently. |
154137336 | about 1 year ago |
“Drivers traveling to southbound PA Turnpike 43 will experience a lane shift at the ramp on Jefferson Boulevard. Traffic has been shifted to the northbound ramp. Once over the bridge, traffic on the ramp will cross back over to southbound side. Drivers traveling southbound from southbound SR 51 need to stop at the end of the ramp before moving onto Jefferson Boulevard.” |
153352105 | about 1 year ago | |
152992472 | about 1 year ago | Just to clarify, do you ride your bike on the train tracks over the parkway or do you fall through the open bridge deck and cross the stream below? More to the point, is this path based on reality in any way? |
152937570 | about 1 year ago | The web page at https://locations.kfc.com/md/elkridge/6281-washington-blvd gives opening hours of `Mo-Su closed`, which suggests that it's closed. It's not obvious from the armchair whether this is temporary or permanent. There are several *hundred* of these. |
144878779 | over 1 year ago | Straighten out the WV/PA line. TIGER is off by about 300 feet. There are two houses with mailing addresses in the "wrong" state, which I'm guessing is the source of TIGER's shape here. Add some addresses along the PA side explicitly. Various state and county sources disagree *slightly* about the geometry here, but none as wildly as TIGER, and the straight line matches up well enough with landcover changes that form the border, so I'm not being picky about which source is best. |
143834473 | almost 2 years ago | Definitely seems to have a sidewalk. |
143017629 | almost 2 years ago | If it actually exists it should be given service=driveway, not deleted. |
142054252 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted in 142117162 |
142054252 | almost 2 years ago | Reason for deleting these? |
142066016 | almost 2 years ago | Looks like you already fixed it, but please try to heed the warnings; JOSM should have run the validator and yelled at you. |
141608829 | almost 2 years ago | That is not a reason to delete it. Change it to a driveway (highway=service, service=driveway). |
141439782 | almost 2 years ago | You shouldn't add `access=no` to indicate pedestrian access. It should be `foot=no`. |
141301815 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, `access=no` is incorrect as it means nobody may use the way, this should be `foot=no`. |
141161946 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted in 141302478 |
141161248 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted in 141302425 |
140728288 | almost 2 years ago | Since the cycleway is physically separated, it's cycleway=track, yes? |
140416394 | almost 2 years ago | The wifi was blocking certain sites, using a device or software which generated a certificate on the fly to generate a message (if I chose to click through the error). I think that this is a factual, mappable scenario but did not see anything under https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=internet_access%3A that looked relevant. A ‘hostile network’ is a more or less standard term. I also asked in slack.openstreetmap.us but nobody suggested anything. |