OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
88278035 almost 5 years ago

Hi Fluffy, wondering what definition you're using for trunk here. The wiki just says that hw=trunk is for "high performance or high importance roads that don't meet the requirement for motorway" and that the criteria vary from country to country, and within the USA from state to state.

Are you basing your changes on a different definition?

88000411 almost 5 years ago

Hi there... you seem to have deleted lots of footways that I created, and as far as I can tell they're still real. Is this is mistake? Is there something I'm not understanding here?

80324903 almost 5 years ago

HI foreverwild, I'm doing some trail mapping in the Catskills and was wondering what the source is for the name "Yellow Connector Trail" for osm.org/way/426363924
Thanks, J

66658086 about 5 years ago

Ok thanks for getting back -- looks like it was fixed 8 months ago! Cheers

83219987 about 5 years ago

Hi ComBlOp -- I wonder if you've considered a slightly different style for mapping these parking lots. It's a little odd to see each of the clusters of parking spaces mapped as an individual amenity=parking. Generally one amenity=parking would be used for the entire parking lot. And in fact, some error-checking software will consider it a problem if an amenity=parking feature does not have a service road going through it.

Your attention to detail is impressive of course! If you really like mapping exactly which parts of the pavement are used for the parking spaces themselves, consider using amenity=parking for the parking lot but mapping each space individually using amenity=parking_space.

Cheer, J

87827605 about 5 years ago

Hi again solongago -- Can you elaborate on the data source for these landuse=residential boundaries?
osm.org/way/824939434
osm.org/way/824939449

Based on aerial imagery, they seem to contain a large amount of undeveloped swamp and woods, plus a large clear-cut powerline corridor.

87721037 about 5 years ago

Thanks... and welcome back after 11 years, I think you may have set the OSM hide-and-seek record!

65753306 about 5 years ago

Update -- I have reconnected the trail here after a message from solongago.

87321589 about 5 years ago

Thanks, great to see the new bridge is open. I connected the Boiceville parking area service road to the trail and added the missing parking areas. I also tried to standardize some of the tags across the various rail trail sections.

65753306 about 5 years ago

Howdy solongago -- I've been mapping in this area based on GPS traces from a hike last year. I had intended to check out the gap that currently exist in the Shawungunk Ridge Trail ( osm.org/note/1889496 ) but took another route and wasn't able to survey.

It looks like this changeset from December 2018 is when that disconnection happened. Was this intentional? Is there actually a road closure here? (The Shawungunk Ridge Trail follows Shinhollow Road here, which is highway=track east of the railroad.)

84803942 about 5 years ago

Ok thanks -- I've split Prospect Hill Road and set the eastern part back to residential.

Btw, if the western part that connects to Cahoonzie Club Road is signed private, you might consider using "private" for the access instead of "permissive". Routing software generally treats "permissive" the same as public access and so will send public traffic over that road. Example: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=41.4476%2C-74.7016%3B41.4636%2C-74.6620#map=14/41.4521/-74.6730&layers=N

84803942 about 5 years ago

Hi jraber_us, thanks for adding this info.

It looks to me like the eastern portion of Prospect Hill Road is in fact a residential road with public access and many houses. I believe it would be appropriate to split the road at this intersection: osm.org/node/222039749

And then set the eastern end back to residential. Does this sound correct?

Thanks, j

86692472 about 5 years ago

Hi Extant, thanks for your work here. I've also been working on some of the roads, trails, and streams in this area. One of the resources I've found useful is the Ulster County GIS map (see https://ulstercountyny.gov/maps/parcel-viewer/ ). This is designed to show land ownership and lot lines, but the basemap also has terrain and water from LIDAR data, and sometimes waterway names. It's not always accurate of course -- nothing is! -- but helpful.

I was able to load this basemap as an imagery layer in JOSM as "tms[19]:https://gis.ulstercountyny.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Tax_Parcels/Basemap_Tax_Map/MapServer//tile/{z}/{y}/{x}" Cheers, J

85114682 about 5 years ago

Hi again Chuckles -- FYI the correct way to tag an alley is to use both highway=service and service=alley tags. See osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley

I've fixed this one for now. J

84570376 about 5 years ago

Hi tylerchill, I'm wondering about the revised geometry of the Delancy/Pitt Street intersection. What imagery are you using for these changes?

84071176 over 5 years ago

FWIW, after a couple years of tweaking imagery alignment using several different GPS receivers, I've come to the conclusion that the best-aligned imagery in NYC is the "NYS Orthos Online" published by the state New York. It's usually the same actual photography as the ESRI imagery, but unfortunately at slightly lower resolution. Anyway, that's what these gardens were aligned to.

84018888 over 5 years ago

Howdy, I noticed you scootched Broadway a bit to the east... has the street been narrowed?

83829143 over 5 years ago

Hi Alyona and welcome to OSM!

This building was marked as having two addresses, 81 7th Avenue South and 22 Barrow Street. It looks like you removed those and you're trying to give it just one address, 18 Barrow Street. Is that correct?

83769367 over 5 years ago

Hi Hugoren Martinako, thanks for your work on the map. In the future it would be great to do these sorts of edits in smaller regions rather than spanning entire continents, because edits of this scope are difficult for software and other mappers to comprehend. Thanks, j

83321533 over 5 years ago

Hi Chuckles, haven't heard back. I've reverted some of the changes that I believe were in error, please reply if you'd like to discuss. J