Evezhiadennoù eus jmapb
Hollad cheñchamantoù | Pegoulz | Evezhiadenn |
---|---|---|
166818189 | 2 deiz zo | Bullmers removed this mislocated fitness center in changeset 166876590 but unfortunately deleted the whole building in the process. I've reverted in changeset 169479627, all fixed now. |
164958290 | 5 deiz zo | Looks like I missed one, just reverted 164941039 with changeset 169342962. In other news, tuesdayyadseut (hello there!) has changed names to tues111, which is a lot less of a mouthful. |
164941039 | 5 deiz zo | Reverted in changeset 169342962, see see comments in changeset 164958290 |
164949377 | 6 deiz zo | Reverted in changeset 169297918, see see comments in changeset 164958290 |
164998419 | 6 deiz zo | Reverted in changeset 169297918, see see comments in changeset 164958290 |
164958009 | 6 deiz zo | Reverted in changeset 169297918, see see comments in changeset 164958290 |
165076605 | 6 deiz zo | Reverted in changeset 169297918, see see comments in changeset 164958290 |
164958290 | 6 deiz zo | I just did changeset 169297918 reverting this, as well as tuesdayyadseut's similar changesets 164998419/164958009/164949377, and your partial repair changeset 165076605 MxxCon. I tried to revert just the messed up building shapes and keep the address updates, but it was too much trouble. But all geocoders I know work fine in Brooklyn without the city and state tags, so no terrible loss. |
158787612 | 20 deiz zo | Hi, what's your source of info for this bridge? Last I checked it was pedestrian only. Are vehicles under 3 tons now permitted? |
101477458 | 29 deiz zo | How lovely, sorry to see them painted over. The current track alignment seems to jive well with the imported easement at osm.org/way/808686181 so I'm not inclined to futz with the subway ways. (Not sure we really need those subterranean easements mapped but I'm not inclined to futz with them either 😉) |
101477458 | 29 deiz zo | Howdy, any chance you remember what's up with these not:railways? osm.org/way/920642655
|
111501834 | war-dro ur miz 'zo. | Recent photos at https://jmapb.github.io/hilton_holiday_gardens/ I was snapping a pic of the path so I could add it later (which I did) but I wondered if this area would merit some additional designation. Still not a park imo; landuse=recreation_ground seems the closest well-known tag. (Wouldn't conflict with natural=scrub if you think that still applies.) |
159858094 | war-dro ur miz 'zo. | Hello, I've reverted this changeset (adding many bogus clinics) in changeset 168111163. Please refrain from adding incorrect information to the map. This data is in heavy use by real people across the world. Thanks. |
111501834 | war-dro ur miz 'zo. | Regarding Hilton Holiday Gardens (osm.org/way/627639475), the parks department classifies this as "Recreational Field/Courts" at https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/hilton-holiday-gardens/ ... I didn't see anyone playing here, but I could imagine it. What do you think of landuse=recreation_ground? |
121629317 | war-dro ur miz 'zo. | Yeah just a typo. But this is actually an automotive leasing broker (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_leasing) and I'm not sure it should be amenity=car_rental. Maybe closer to shop=car. There's a short mention of this question under osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dcar#leasing-only but no resolution. Maybe it belongs under office -- there are no cars, just people handling the paperwork. All moot in this case, though, because this business is now closed -- I marked it as disused. |
167188929 | war-dro ur miz 'zo. | Hi vanessatryfi, thanks for your contribution! Boris & Horton is already mapped as a cafe node (osm.org/node/5603534984) so I added the dog=yes tag there. It's part of an existing building, so drawing it as its own building isn't correct -- I deleted the extra building. |
167705864 | war-dro ur miz 'zo. | Human error uploading changeset -- comment should be "update and align pois", source should be "survey;local knowledge;nyorthos;bing aerial;business websites" |
165277072 | 3 miz zo | Hi dannmer, did you confirm that this building construction is complete? |
161036608 | 4 miz zo | Hi there VulpesInculta, can you explain your thinking behind these reclassifications? |
164510979 | 4 miz zo | Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group |