OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
132236518 over 2 years ago

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/132274327

132236518 over 2 years ago

Also, things like opening hours and phone numbers should be in the standard form noted on the wiki.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132236518

131979707 over 2 years ago

Thank you! I forgot about this :-)

131928625 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OSM!
Here is some feedback on your recent edits:

The description=* tag is not meant for advertisements. Please read this for more info: osm.wiki/Key:description#No_advertising:~:text=No%20advertising%5B,your%20OSM%20account.

Please do not use the image=* tag for logos. See osm.wiki/Key:image for more info on how to use it instead.

The tag phone=* should be in ITU-T E.164 format, not the way used in this changeset. See osm.wiki/Key:phone#:~:text=phone%3Dnumber,the%20same%20way. for more details.

A reply and appropriate fixes would be greatly appreciated.

jmarchon

131972476 over 2 years ago

That makes sense.
If I remember correctly from being there last, there is also conflicting information on site. Some signs do say just "Eugene", and others the name I put in.

Thanks,
jmarchon

132023046 over 2 years ago

Hello,
I made some improvements to your tagging. This could be useful to you for future reference: osm.wiki/Key:socket
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132023046

131972476 over 2 years ago

Hello,
"Eugene, OR Amtrak" is the name which is signed on location. Does that not mean it is the right name?

jmarchon

129499684 over 2 years ago

Should be fixed now. I've moved all the station tags to this outline way: osm.org/way/1136868681

Also, it looks like the tags were on the building already before I touched it.
Thanks again,
jmarchon

129499684 over 2 years ago

I'm not exactly sure anymore since this was 2 months ago, but it was probably unintentional. I'll fix it shortly, thank you!

131778936 over 2 years ago

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/131831248

131778903 over 2 years ago

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/131831248

131778353 over 2 years ago

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/131831248

131831248 over 2 years ago

Thank you!

131085080 over 2 years ago

Hi,
OpenStreetMap is not for advertising or spam. I have attempted to fix your changes.
Have a nice day

130767680 over 2 years ago

Thank you for your answer. Would you mind using the source= tag in future changesets? It helps prevent confusion.
Have a wonderful day,
jmarchon

130767680 over 2 years ago

Hello,
What is the source of this address info?
Have a nice day,
jmarchon

130181793 over 2 years ago

Hello,
Thank you for your answer. I agree now that highway=pedestrian may not be fitting.

130181793 over 2 years ago

Hello,
Mapbox imagery is quite out of date here and does not show the results of recent construction in this area (at least the last time I checked). I have been here in person and would consider this a pedestrian highway. May I ask what other sources were used for this change?
Have a nice day,
jmarchon

130401281 over 2 years ago

Sorry for the large bbox - I got a bit carried away :)

130268971 over 2 years ago

Hi,
Please use more descriptive changeset comments. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more details

Have a nice day,
jmarchon