OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
162032550 6 months ago

Thanks. I assumed SCEE was updating this correctly. I'll fix these.

161839271 6 months ago

Is this location correct? It looks like an erroneous duplicate of the one added in changeset 161839639. osm.org/changeset/161839639#map=19/49.264441/-123.101801

Thanks,
Joel

161840552 6 months ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I reverted your changeset because you changed the entire school block to become a building by adding the tag building=school.

Thanks,
Joel

161687598 6 months ago

Hi GenShibe,

I appreciate the work on the transit details.

It would be much appreciated if you could provide a brief description of your changes along with each changesets instead of just "fix things".

Thanks,
Joel

161320798 7 months ago

Good update, thanks - and welcome to OSM!

I made a small change to add "Richmond General Hospital" as the old_name

150559739 7 months ago

Hi meisoof, I wanted to point out a few issues I have found with this changeset:
1) Traffic signals should be mapped at the stop line of the way coming in to the intersection instead of exiting the intersection (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals)
2) King Edward Street and United Boulevard are not a dual-carriageways since there is no physical barrier separating the two directions.

Do you want to try to fix these issues before I take a look? Thanks, Joel

159790024 8 months ago

👍
I copied the address from the deleted building to the construction area just so we don't lose it.

159440730 8 months ago

如果不是 "bicycle=yes", 那么是 "bicycle=no" 吗? 谢谢

158718832 9 months ago

I wasn't sure so I thought I would check! Thanks 👍👍

156787504 9 months ago

Hi meisoof, is the intersection at 128 and 80 divided along 128 St? I checked aerial and street view images and nothing shows that they are divided. Maybe there was construction very recently?
Thanks,
Joel

158718832 9 months ago

I just happened to notice - this looks like a duplicate?

158404788 9 months ago

Thank you for fixing this

156577469 11 months ago

Hi,
Thanks for contributing to the map!

I think these features would be better suited to OpenHistoricalMap (https://www.openhistoricalmap.org).

OpenStreetMap is for mapping objects that currently exist. See the explanation on the wiki: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

Thanks,
Joel

156743176 11 months ago

I guess someone wanted to be clear we should not be trying something like this: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=bicycle+tightrope&iax=images&ia=images
😛

156632262 11 months ago

Thanks for this update. I changed the tagging to reflect that the shop is now vacant.

134402533 11 months ago

Hi ngry_pazuzu,
I noticed the Mapbox imagery shows a number of differences at the 96 Ave / Fraser Hwy intersection. Your changeset doesn't really match either the old imagery or the new imagery so before I go make changes I thought I would check - maybe both are old and what you have mapped is more up to date?

Thanks,
Joel

156162908 11 months ago

I removed some extra segments and changed the turn restrictions to match what I see in the aerial imagery - does this match what you want the turn restrictions to be?

In the future, it can be easier and more accurate to just revert the changeset instead of trying to manually change each component back and there is a tool which helps a lot: https://revert.monicz.dev/

155794967 11 months ago

I agree. Good change, thanks.

155541463 11 months ago

Thanks! I added a link to your menu.

153779925 about 1 year ago

Thanks!