jonorossi's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
92773808 | almost 5 years ago | No need to apologise, thanks for fixing it so quickly! Great work adding more detail along Kinross lately. |
92773808 | almost 5 years ago | Are you sure that property on Pararoma Dr has a ford along their driveway and not a culvert? It sort of looks like the concrete culvert ends are in aerial imagery. |
91949243 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Mick, welcome to OSM. Areas tagged with building=* should only cover the building itself, not the land around it, see osm.wiki/Key:building for more info. That then lets us add building=shed, leisure=swimming_pool, etc. We then use a different area usually over all contiguous land for the same purpose with a landuse=* tag. e.g. landuse=residential over the private land but not usually the roads. Often landuse areas get mapped before individual buildings because you can add a landuse=retail as a simple rectangle in a minute, but feel free to add whichever level of detail you like first, especially areas you know well. The OSM Wiki is a great resource to understand established tagging. Jono |
91849849 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, could you please explain why you are changing footpaths from highway=footway to highway=path, but more importantly why you are adding bicycle=no when cycling is permitted on footpaths in QLD. |
90836093 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks |
90836093 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, great work with most of the changes, however you've extended Yasmin Court into private land, the cul de sac ends where it was before, just outside the purple roof house. |
88035777 | about 5 years ago | Ignore the last comment, I thought you were working for the Microsoft OSM team but got confused, they've been making hundreds of changesets a day. |
88035777 | about 5 years ago | Oh, sorry. I don't live there, but know someone who does. My understanding is the whole estate/neighbourhood has always been Logandale (the welcome sign out on Beenleigh Redland Bay Road has been there as long as I can remember), there are however two townhouse developments inside the estate, Logandale Lakes on Peninsula Avenue and Huntingdale East on Gleneagles Avenue. I've just added those 2 townhouse/unit areas. Side note: thank your team for working on adding street names around SE QLD, amazing to see so many were missing. |
88035777 | about 5 years ago | Hi, I've reverted (changeset 88062705) this changeset. Logandale is a place (in the surburb of Cornubia), it has signage, parks, a gatehouse, security guards, a web site, etc. I've changed (changeset 88062955) it to a place=neighbourhood as that appears to be a better tag than hamlet. I'd recommend not just deleting something you haven't verified on the ground, the person who added it didn't do it for no reason. Jono |
88046239 | about 5 years ago | Hi, you've tagged a private driveway as Habermann Road. I've corrected this along with other improvements in changeset 88062250. Jono |
86597492 | about 5 years ago | Hi, I noticed you've added data using QLD DCDB data over the last few days. Unfortunately OSM still can't get DNRME to sign the required waiver, so even though the data is licensed under CC BY 4.0 we can't use it yet, see: osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue I'm in discussion with someone who has made contact with DNRME today to see if we can make progress on a signed waiver, since we haven't tried for a while. Jono |
86571552 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for responding and reverting it so quickly, the situation with DNRME is unfortunately annoying, their data would be very useful. You'll find everything they release will probably have the current year on it. If you want more information why OSM needs a waiver to use any CC BY 4.0 data have a read of the OSMF blog post:
|
86571552 | about 5 years ago | Hi Tym, you've added the Brisbane boundary from DNRME data, however unfortunately OSM still can't get DNRME to sign the required waiver so even though the data is licensed under CC BY 4.0 we can't use it yet, see: osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue
Also note the Import Guidelines which recommend discussing any imports:
It would be great if we can find another source for city boundaries because I've wanted to add Redland and Brisbane boundaries for ages. Probably best to start a discussion on talk-au. Jono |
85858123 | about 5 years ago | Hi, this trail is public access on council owned land in the road reserve of Schoeck Road. Council has signs at the Avalon Road end, however I don't recall any signs at the end of Schoeck Road. |
85857415 | about 5 years ago | Hi, it looks like you've accidentally moved the node for 170 Ford Road with your change to Araluen Lane. |
84094706 | over 5 years ago | Nice work Andrew, I hope the ride was good, we'll get this park all mapped soon enough. I fixed up the power line where you added an extra node and some nearly duplicate extra nodes on the track right next to it. |
83806163 | over 5 years ago | @Warin61 completely agree, it is all owned by BCC including the model aero club, I didn't know a public golf course is coming. Their web site confirms they are all community facilities: https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/things-to-see-and-do/council-venues-and-precincts/parks/minnippi-parklands @JonathanMBunker, since you are doing great work adding features to the parklands I'll leave fixing the relations to you. |
83806163 | over 5 years ago | @Warin61, so everyone is on the same page, I assume you saying there is no need for the parking, dog park, picnic shelter, playground and softball areas (someone went overboard) to be inner members of the Parklands relation because they are actually just features of the park? |
83806163 | over 5 years ago | Hi, I think you'd make a mistake here in your tagging with Minnippi Parklands. You've changed the name of the park (or group of parks, so many different names on signs in there) and tagged it with natural=water which it is not. I agree that this area is flood prone, but only small sections are actually wetlands. |
83350653 | over 5 years ago | Hi, you've added a new node (7388495103) on Mount Cotton Road with just the tag ddd=yes. I assume this was a mistake? |