I've updated the rediATM at Central and relocated the 2 elements at Park.

Don't worry I get the same problem with imagery offsets, it is frustrating. The stitching of imagery works so well that you can't see where they blend, but when you've traced it, the offset error shows up a lot.

Hi, is there a reason you've removed admin_level=6 from the Redland City boundary? It is valid and was imported from the PSMA dataset.

I've removed the undocumented developer= tag since you just added operator=. I think I must have just found developer= from iD's autocomplete because the wiki has nothing.

A tip regarding realigning currently mapped objects to aerial imagery is to instead change your imagery offset to match existing data. I used Maxar when I originally mapped this and other things around it like Pine Lodge, but every refresh of their imagery (and other sources) things move around, just find some fences or streets to offset your imagery before making edits. I've moved the former chicken sheds back so they are right when relative to the boundary/fence.

I've also made some other changes in changeset 766598539, including adding that watercourse back and this time adding the culvert under Woodlands Dr. The developers can't remove the watercourse, it'll stay in the backyard of those lots.

Since we don't have permission to copy the developer's proposed estate map, my plan was to map the streets as they become visible, I've added 2 where the turning circles are very clear now. That also means OSM reflects reality rather than worrying about proposed vs construction.

Cheers, Jono

Hi Shan, welcome to OSM.

You've added the tag "name=Little Billibong" which isn't a local name I've ever heard used or seen signposted for this little hole in the ground/pond. The "name" key shouldn't be used as a description, see the OSM wiki for more info: osm.wiki/Key:name. I'd also dispute this being a billabong (spelling) as there is no river/creek feeding it.

The 3 access restriction tags (foot=, bicycle=, horse=) you've added to the ford are unnecessary because the highway=path already has access restrictions. Access tags don't define who can physically use the feature but who is legally allowed to (osm.wiki/Key:access). The highway=path also has horse=no because horses aren't permitted on singletracks in Redland parks, so horse=yes on the ford is incorrect.

Apologies if I've come across harsh, definitely not the intention, OSM tagging is more complicated than it first appears and takes a while to get your head around it.

Let me know if you've got any questions. Jono

Shouldn't building:levels=3 not 1, the underground carpark isn't underground on the northern side so it gets counted as a level, and there are 2 normal levels.

As far as I knew the Redlands Research Facility was only on the eastern side of the creek as I mapped, but I'm not involved with it.

Council brought an old Department of Primary Industries site last year on MacArthur St after it sat there unused for many years (https://www.redlandcitybulletin.com.au/story/6458673/council-looks-for-recreational-ideas-on-old-dpi-site/), so at least that part is out.

Great work. Nice to see Ethel Street fixed up, I had planned to go back into that street since last time running along the old embankment because I could see there was a proper street in there.

Regarding your change from highway=track to path, I tagged it track because it is like a rail trail or fire road (or "forest track" as per wiki), suitable for a 2 track vehicle even if only council is allowed to use it for maintenance now (the reason for motor_vehicle=no) since trains don't use it. I'd like to understand the change as it appears I've tagged it wrong.

Thanks, Jono

I didn't add the node, but I can understand why Rob added it a year ago. The wiki says "A place where tourists, visitors, hikers might like to visit and take photographs", and I think that spot does qualify under those guidelines. Our coastline has a lot of good viewpoints, but do you feel it doesn't qualify? I think it is definitely the most accessible viewpoint in the GS Wetlands.

I've found it very common for Courts to have street numbers in sequence like that rather than odd one side even the other.

Cuscal used to own and operate the rediATMs, but looks like it was sold to Armaguard Group last year. I remember nab left as a partner a couple years ago they definitely never operated them, you get charged fees to use them now (I'm a nab customer).

There are definitely 2 postboxes outside the AusPost shop, red and yellow just next to the glass door. I think there used to be a payphone near the main northern entrance but you'd have to confirm.

Shouldn't the end of Holloway St and Waterview Pl have a footway joining them instead of noexit=yes, or is there now a fence blocking foot/cycle access?

Cheers

Australia is a bit of a mix between whether it is allowed, in QLD as long as there is no sign prohibiting it (e.g. Queen Street Mall, and other outdoor dining on footpath) then you are allowed, it is much safer for kids and casual riders.
https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/safety/rules/wheeled-devices/bicycle#footpath

I get emails for other people's comments on OSM, you might need to change your settings.

Thanks for getting back to me.

It used to be a flower farm before being sold in the last few years. Aren't most of them greenhouses not sheds?

Ah, but the building is not an overpass over the footpath. Interestingly you can get rid of the warning by just splitting the footway and joining it to the boundary, I'd do that and tag it highway=corridor+indoor=yes.

Was layer=1 on the building intentional? If so, what for? I'm curious because I don't understand the need.

Nice work on the upgrades, I think quite a few of those shops no longer exist though, but that's another problem.

Nice work. I've corrected a few things and added more tagging in changeset 93148848. I've been inside so it helps :)

You missed the western greenhouse, I marked the northern one access=no because that is staff only, I changed the parking tags because I think the first parking lot is staff parking (I've always parked in front of the main shed not near the loading docks).

I couldn't find the best tag to indicate it is trade only, so added shop=trade, trade=* should probably be landscaping or something.

You've removed the building=* tag from the building and added landuse=plant_nursery to the building (renders green now), which isn't very accurate as there are no plants inside the big shed only under the northern awning and outside (sometimes with shade cloth).

I've made some changes in changeset 93089856 including adding some more detail. Happy to discuss if you disagree with my changes.

Jono

Completely agree. I've found a bunch of places that the MSFTOpenMaps project added roads names in inappropriate places (including private driveways at end of streets) over the last few months, I caught a pile as they were added but in the peak there was about 100 changesets a day to review.

Make sure to remove the "source:name" tag.