jonorossi's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
101860598 | over 4 years ago | Consider using entrance=* or amenity=parking_entrance rather than notes to map how to get into a building. See the wiki for more info. |
100975493 | over 4 years ago | What does "Mo-Su 12:00" mean, it opens and closes at lunch time? You can probably just change it to "24/7". |
100668632 | over 4 years ago | I'd go with:
osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
Completely up to you, but I'd usually not bother mapping proposed buildings or driveways until they start getting built. Legally you'll find the BCC construction plans are copyright, so you should really only trace aerial imagery or physically look at the site and not copy from their plans. |
100668653 | over 4 years ago | Hi Alan, You've accidentally moved the node for 6 Glengala Drive to Lillian Ct. Jono |
100668632 | over 4 years ago | Hi again Alan, same comments apply here as changeset 100668563 regarding lifecycle tags and building footprint. I haven't looked at the proposed plans for this area for quite some time, but you've named this "Depot". Is this where they are parking the buses overnight and for maintenance? If so, then this isn't a public_transport=station for us public to use. Jono |
100668563 | over 4 years ago | Hi Alan, welcome to OSM and great to see more local mappers. I've got a few comments on your changeset to help improve them:
Let me know if you've got any further questions. |
100160673 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I don't believe the hazard=yes tag you've added to a section of the cycleway makes sense. "yes" doesn't mean anything. This tag "is intended to tag hazards that are explicitly declared by posted signage and/or government declaration". I don't recall anything other than road crossings that could be a concern there, and crossings have their own tagging. Take a read of the wiki for more info:
Jono |
97194624 | over 4 years ago | Hi, nice work tagging this pipeline, I had always wondered the route it took through Brisbane because specific spots are very visible on aerial imagery. Just a few comments on tagging:
Jono |
96467238 | over 4 years ago | Some additional info on top of what nevw said, if you'd like to indicate a section of Fryar Road is flood prone (for example next to Albert River Park) then take a look at the OSM wiki on the flood_prone key which can be applied to a split section of the road: osm.wiki/Key:flood_prone. |
94121342 | over 4 years ago | I've added the Old DPI site (which council has out for tender for someone to use) and reduced the RRF boundary. I'm still interested to know more about the rest of the RRF boundary because I thought it was only on the eastern side of the creek. |
95795154 | over 4 years ago | I hope you guys were safe yesterday with the wild weather, and are having a great holiday. Great mapping, but you've added the address of the office at Dunwich to the Amity Point campground, too many drinks? :) Jono |
95716678 | over 4 years ago | Are you sure adding location:transition=yes to the power pole on Redland Bay Rd and Teesdale Rd is right? I added this 33kV line (and heaps more in southern Redlands) earlier this year after surveying (yep, driving and running around looking up at conductors), but didn't get around to finish taking this line from the bulk supply substation to the two Capalaba sub-stations. I don't recall this going underground and thought the only section of underground I could find was from the Capalaba substation from Moreton Bay Capalaba Rd. |
95495107 | over 4 years ago | noexit=yes should be added only to the last node of a highway to confirm there is no ability to continue when there is a nearby highway close by (no need for it at the end of a cul-de-sac), you've got barrier=fence with no gate which defines that there is an obstruction. |
95119742 | over 4 years ago | Would the waterway under the shopping centre be better tagged as tunnel=flooded rather than tunnel=culvert? |
94894892 | over 4 years ago | Same review comments as changeset 94893558 apply here. |
94893558 | over 4 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. I have 2 comments about your recent edits in Cornubia: 1. Buildings (i.e. building=*) should be the outline of the building, not a land parcel. They should also not be connected to the golf course.
Could you please correct your edits. Thanks, Jono |
94095742 | over 4 years ago | It wasn't vehicle traffic, the embankment used to hold the Cleveland train line before it was rebuilt in the 70s or 80s to newer standards where they needed more gradual curves, you can see the old concrete abutment and concrete pillar in the middle of the lake. There is also a historic plaque with the info. Personally I see the difference here vs a concrete footpath is most concrete footpaths are only around 1.2m wide, not enough for a motor vehicle, RTV doesn't count :), their purpose is as a footpath. This one physically is capable of a dual track motor vehicle even though motor vehicles are prohibited for you and I. Track being higher up the highway hierarchy than footway, like cycleway is higher than footway. Fire roads in your local nature reserve are exactly the same, council maintenance and fire trucks can physically use it as a dual track vehicle, but access tags say we residents aren't allowed to do the same. Thanks for the discussion, I'm always trying to learn, tagging definitely isn't cut and dry. I've restored/upgraded it to highway=track. |
94095167 | over 4 years ago | Fair enough, lot numbers are definitely common before council has allocated street names and numbers. It's always funny to see real estate advertisements for 123 New Street. |
94095814 | over 4 years ago | Haha, an hour looking, that's commitment. I'm happy to leave it deleted, there are so many "viewpoints" along our shoreline, probably best to only mark the commonly visited ones. Thanks. |
94757026 | over 4 years ago | I think most of these buildings you've tagged industrial along Redland Bay Rd are more likely just generically building=commercial or warehouse/retail. According to the wiki building=industrial is for "A building where some industrial process takes place". The front "building" of Redlands Mazda is all part of the one building, I didn't even notice the roof was different, I assume just a different construction. It has glass windows across the whole front and you can walk straight through from sales area to the service area/cafe. There is a roof to the eastern side though, the undercover service dropoff. |