jtracey's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
137855556 | almost 2 years ago | Are these streets actually under current construction, or merely proposed? |
137855505 | almost 2 years ago | Are these streets actually under current construction, or merely proposed? |
136168069 | almost 2 years ago | Is this feature actually under construction currently, or merely proposed? |
139909833 | almost 2 years ago | Are these features under construction currently? Aerial imagery shows them as being complete. |
138599254 | almost 2 years ago | Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed? |
141834313 | almost 2 years ago | Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed? |
141839653 | almost 2 years ago | Reverts osm.org/changeset/141834154 |
141834154 | almost 2 years ago | As has been explained to you before, this is not how things are mapped in OSM. You cannot map things that are not under construction as construction. If you're not going to engage with the OSM community, you're just going to get blocked (again). I'm reverting this edit, and now have to go through your other edits to see what other damage you have done. Next edit I see like this, I'm reporting you to the DWG. |
140911710 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves:
|
140911569 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves osm.org/note/3853631 |
140911383 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves osm.org/note/3844911 |
140911259 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves the following notes:
|
140910918 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves osm.org/note/3854715 |
140833076 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves osm.org/note/3871967 |
140832883 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves osm.org/note/3867965 |
140593281 | almost 2 years ago | Resolves osm.org/note/3861123 |
140254975 | almost 2 years ago | resolves osm.org/note/3846781 |
140151292 | about 2 years ago | Ahh yes, this is a known problem, see https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2025 and https://media.jochentopf.com/media/2022-08-15-study-evolution-of-the-osm-data-model.pdf for more context (tl;dr: there's no solution for now, the planned new API revision might be a good time to change it). However, including any kind of non-readable data in tags isn't allowed, so as clever as it is, I'd say next time just note it in a fixme tag or something ;) |
140151292 | about 2 years ago | What is 'opening_hours:gzip'? |
140142415 | about 2 years ago | resolves osm.org/note/3843082 and osm.org/note/3843088 |