Again, please use meaningful changeset descriptions.

Sorry, what is it you're trying to add here? A crossing means crosswalk, i.e., a place where pedestrians cross a road, which this clearly isn't (you added a squiggly line around a building). Maybe if you describe what it is you're trying to add, I can help you?

Please try to use meaningful changeset comments, so other mappers can quickly tell what you're changing. :)

Okay, so unfortunately, we're not allowed to copy information from other maps, nor Wikipedia:

osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...?

osm.wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia#Geodata_import/exports_with_Wikimedia_projects

This is a bit of an unusual circumstance in that the map from Chicopee is pretty abstract, but it would still be preferred if this information came from elsewhere (in any case, the Wikipedia information is definitely not allowed). Are you familiar with Chicopee? If I were to revert this edit, could you add back the information in question from memory?

These buildings were all already mapped (they existed before this edit, but you yourself added them again after this edit as well). Did the editor not display the buildings, or was there something else you were trying to do?

Just commenting for posterity to say I agree with this classification of Ring Road. I'd originally mapped it as unclassified, but it was changed (I suspect to keep bike routing off it), and I didn't want to start an edit war.

Resolves osm.org/note/3917826

Sorry for so many replies, but I should probably also mention that this was discussed a few times on the Canadian mailing list, and there was consensus every time that these tags should be removed from junctions, as is done everywhere else.

Oh, if it wasn't clear, the ways do already contain the destination, that's why I didn't add it. I tried to be careful and make sure that was always the case, feel free to let me know if I missed any.

The destination goes on the way, not the node (since the node contains both/every way, i.e., is on the highway, so it isn't clear which "destination" it would be referring to). See the wiki for more info:

osm.wiki/Tag:highway=motorway%20junction?uselang=en#Destination_of_the_exit

Are these areas actually under construction, or are you once again marking proposed features as construction?

You need to reply to comments like this. If you don't reply to this comment before making any further edits, I'm reporting you to the DWG.

Sorry to ask on such an old changeset, but how sure are you about the fords added here? Some of these look like culverts from aerial imagery

this also changed the description to a note, since it's more useful to editors, and removed the URL because it didn't fit anyway. For posterity, here's the full URL: https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/schneider-family-donating-almost-100-hectares-of-nearly-untouched-nature-to-rare-charitable-reserve/article_875685be-2c67-59a5-9ac8-b8df254263a5.html

Are these features actually under construction, or merely proposed?

Are these streets actually under current construction, or merely proposed?

Are these streets actually under current construction, or merely proposed?

Is this feature actually under construction currently, or merely proposed?

Are these features under construction currently? Aerial imagery shows them as being complete.

Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed?

Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed?