Should be "fee=yes" + "charge=3.25 CAD", at least according to the wiki.

Thanks for all the edits btw, awesome stuff.

Resolves osm.org/note/4582010

Resolves osm.org/note/4632554

Resolves osm.org/note/4629622

iD is clearly warning you about some of the mistakes you're making. Please reply to my private message so we can discuss how to avoid these issues.

Thanks for the edits. :)

Are these bike paths, or bike lanes? I.e., is there any kind of physical separation from the roadway beyond paint?

Please don't put curb nodes (lowered or raised) in the middle of sidewalks, only put them where a single sidewalk and crossing meet. Otherwise, navigation apps will interpret it as curb in the sidewalk. (Unless, of course, there really is a curb in the middle of the sidewalk e.g. the visually impaired need to know to navigate around.)

Please don't tag things as cycleways simply because bicycles can use it. E.g., a driveway is not a cycleway, even if using it is required to access cycle routes.

Resolves osm.org/note/4532597

I've already changed it in the couple places it happened, but just for future reference: it's rarely right for there to be a curb where two sidewalks intersect, since it shows on navigation systems for the visually impaired or wheelchair users that they have to go down and up the curb/ramp just to get between the two adjacent sidewalks. That's why you'll see little sidewalk nubs sticking out on the corners of intersections, so that the curb/ramp only applies to where the sidewalk meets the crossing.

Resolves the following notes:

osm.org/note/4475980
osm.org/note/4476004
osm.org/note/4490785
osm.org/note/4490787
osm.org/note/4490788

resolves osm.org/note/4513656

hopefully resolves osm.org/note/4498173

resolves osm.org/note/4491733

resolves osm.org/note/4406071

resolves osm.org/note/4378861

resolves osm.org/note/4363564

resolves osm.org/note/4332211

What did you mean by the fixmes added here?