OpenStreetMap
julcnx's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 110574102 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks!
|
| 110574102 | almost 4 years ago | Hi! I am curious what is OSMI router? and what was the exact problem?
|
| 110541404 | almost 4 years ago | "Soi 9 is not accessible" What are you trying to do? Customers can only enter from the east side ? What about Soi 9?
|
| 110454989 | almost 4 years ago | The roads are clearly within a private area ( landuse=greenhouse_horticulture) so they must be tagged as service. Please refer to the official Thailand wiki guidelines below and apply the appropriate minor road classification to this changeset and all future ones. thank you.
|
| 110435683 | almost 4 years ago | There is no way you can identify here the surface from satellite imagery. Please refrain from changing existing classifications with imagery alone. Please kindly revert.
|
| 110440195 | almost 4 years ago | Wrong minor road classification. Please choose the appropriate classification for this and future changesets according to the official guidelines:
|
| 110440305 | almost 4 years ago | Wrong minor road classification. Please choose the appropriate classification for this and future changesets according to the official guidelines:
|
| 110416919 | almost 4 years ago | Please combine changes in a smaller geographical area (city, district, province). Add a description to your changeset. Are you familiar with the country you are mapping? Have you read their guidelines (if any)
|
| 110409629 | almost 4 years ago | The links are good to know but you omit one basic thing: productivity. Thousands of volunteers review during their limited free time dozens/hundreds of changesets per day to maintain a certain quality in their area of mapping. They do not have time to manually construct links, jump from one tool to another. So until the tools are improved and those technical issues are solved, the very small minority of mappers making changesets spanning over multiple countries/regions are basically disrespecting the work of thousands of reviewers across the world. Got plenty of time yourself? Then please go improve the tools so we don’t have to argue about this again.
|
| 110409629 | almost 4 years ago | If everyone does large geographical changesets, then no one will want to review local changes in osmcha.org. What if a country has its own specific guidelines? Have you even considered that? -1
|
| 110365478 | almost 4 years ago | In the past, many residential have been wrongly tagged as service+alley. If you are familiar with the area, feel free to change them to residential if you are sure they are not private roads/driveways (service). best, julien
|
| 110326112 | almost 4 years ago | If a road is on private land, highway=service would be more appropriate with the corresponding access tag (e.g. customers). If the main purpose of a road is access to agricultural fields, a highway=track would be the better choice. In most cases unclassified should be only used for long through traffic roads linking villages and other destinations along a public road. For more info: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
|
| 110328181 | almost 4 years ago | Maybe "description "would be more appropriate instead of name?
|
| 110314991 | almost 4 years ago | thanks for cleaning up the map. I would however recommend keeping clearly visible minor roads (driveways, residential, and track). Many of these minor roads have been wrongly tagged, feel free to fix them based on the new official section for minor highway classification below, and let me know if you have any questions about them. thanks, julien
|
| 110307524 | almost 4 years ago | Marco, I already sent you a message. Please use Maxar instead of Bing. Some buildings you have added do not exist anymore. Please review your past edits, it is the responsibility of the mapper to respond to changeset discussions and correct them when necessary. If I do not hear further from you, I may have to flag you and revert your changesets. มาร์โค ฉันส่งข้อความถึงคุณแล้ว โปรดใช้ Maxar แทน Bing อาคารบางหลังที่คุณเพิ่มไม่มีอยู่อีกต่อไป โปรดตรวจสอบการแก้ไขที่ผ่านมาของคุณ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้ทำแผนที่ในการตอบกลับการอภิปรายเกี่ยวกับชุดการแก้ไขและแก้ไขเมื่อจำเป็น หากฉันไม่ได้ยินจากคุณเพิ่มเติม เราอาจต้องตั้งค่าสถานะคุณและเปลี่ยนชุดการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณ
|
| 110203191 | almost 4 years ago | Hello Hein, a tip about names in general. "name" should be for the official local name, "name:en" for the English translation, "name:th" for the Thai name (often duplicated) If the official restaurant name is in Thai and you only know it in English, then only use "name:en". Cheers, Julien. See this example osm.org/node/4592605527/history
|
| 110219289 | almost 4 years ago | While the beginning of the road is clearly residential, the remaining part is mostly giving access to agricultural fields (track). The last part of the road might even be a private road (service). If you are not sure, do not add or split the road into multiple segments so it's easier to change later. thanks
|
| 110219289 | almost 4 years ago | Please refer to the official OSM Thailand guidelines for minor road classifications. osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
|
| 110278154 | almost 4 years ago | Why curving the road at the end ? There is no clear visible path under it and the other property has its own road.
|
| 110192623 | almost 4 years ago | Hello Marco, please kindly use Maxar or ESRI instead of Bing which has outdated imagery in Northern Thailand. Some of the buildings you added do not exists anymore. If you can, please also combine multiple edits in the same area within the same changesets so it is easier for others to review. Just curious, what has adding farming huts to do with a Malaria program? Best, Julien
|