julcnx's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
125073495 | almost 3 years ago | thank you :)
|
125045683 | almost 3 years ago | |
44655934 | almost 3 years ago | osm.org/node/4571241383/history what did you mean by highway=turning_circle ? dead-end?
|
124521510 | about 3 years ago | Hi, your colleague already contacted the community at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=76155
|
124521510 | about 3 years ago | which organization? FYI: all new organized editing campaigns must be documented and reported beforehand to the Thailand community (osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand)
|
124521510 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Mary. You have been adding a lot of new unclassified roads across Thailand. Are you mapping remotely for an organization or company? |
124683741 | about 3 years ago | I have reverted your changes due to conflicting tag changes. thank you
|
124681590 | about 3 years ago | reverted road addition as overlapping building and invalid classification.
|
124681622 | about 3 years ago | hey. on what basis did you make this classification change? your description says you are remotely mapping from India for companies. FYI, organized editing teams are required to submit their project to the Thailand users forum as per the Thailand wiki project.
|
124339012 | about 3 years ago | I was actually thinking that we should maybe have one rule to downgrade tertiary sections that are mostly unpaved/4wd only. There are quite a few especially near/inside national parks including e.g. Pai to Muang Noi.
|
124339012 | about 3 years ago | hi nitinatsangsit, I believe you made those edits based on the DRR data. Unfortunately, some drawings are wrong, and segments like 478967119, 327173183, 202506151 in Samoeng are actually offroad tracks/paths unsuitable for normal cars. Maybe it was the agency's initial plan to go this way and never happened, or simply a data mistake. Let me know if I should revert these classifications. cheers, julien
|
123095893 | about 3 years ago | Hi OpMen, thanks for your contributions! FYI, tracks which purpose are primarily for agricultural purposes should be kept a highway=track, while residential roads are typically found within settlements. Main links between settlements should be tagged as unclassified. All these are described in the wiki (osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand). If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
|
122607288 | about 3 years ago | Hi NateeT. Thanks for updating "Tonys Path". You tagged it as both motorcar=no and motor_vehicle=yes. Did you mean motorcycle=yes?
|
122569323 | about 3 years ago | thanks for your contributions! is this a new road/bridge? it doesn't show on satellite imagery.
|
122675248 | about 3 years ago | thanks for your contributions bikerdix! I see you re-aligned the main service road. Please beware that Bing imagery is often misaligned with GPS traces. A better alternative is Maxar Premium Imagery available in the Background Settings menu on the right side of the map. Happy mapping!
|
115870086 | about 3 years ago | @SomeoneElse Thanks for the heads up and warning, and apologies to @Autoisme for my out of place changeset comments. I also made the mistake of directly messaging mappers for clarifications instead of using changeset comments, and assume they were regular mappers without checking their profile. I also thought mappers were expected to participate in prior communications when contacted, and that ignoring those, intentionally or not, could be considered a form of vandalism, but I was obviously wrong and I apologize to anyone I may have offended or scared off, especially new mappers like @Autoisme
|
120594451 | over 3 years ago | Hi Natee! I have added recently missing paths based on public GPS data. If you are aware that an existing path is wide enough for a quad/4wd, please feel free to convert those to highway=track. e.g. motor_vehicle=yes are only meant for legal access, and might not be sufficient for routers. Cheers, Julien
|
120097515 | over 3 years ago | In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
|
120095086 | over 3 years ago | In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
|
119798888 | over 3 years ago | Sorry I missed the maps.me part. I will check with them if anything can be done. happy travels! |