Hi tomhukins.
Bit fuzzy on this, it's some time ago.
I marked this as a crossing because the kerbs are lowered at both sides here.
I've been focussing on accessibility for disabled people, and the lowered kerbs are relevant to this particular group.
I'm happy for the change to be reverted if you feel it's not a crossing point in the formal sense.

Hi Jan.

I've checked the road here today, and there are two lanes separated by a solid 'no overtaking' white line. I'm happy that the edit should remain.

(Avinguda de Dénia)

Regards

Richard.

Evening,
Luckily I was re-passing this way today and you are right. There is a bridleway sign (which I actually parked next to during my survey visit) that I'd missed. So, the signage is correct and I'll amend some of my edits now to reflect the situation on the ground. More work to do in this area still!

Understood. I'm thinking I deleted a way and re-put it back in - not my normal approach. It must have been some serious disentangling I thought I was doing.

Have a good weekend.

Richard.

Hi kreuzschnabel.

Thanks for highlighting this. There certainly was no intention to break the routes! I'll make sure to scroll down to the relations before confirming updates in the future.

All the best.
Richard.

Agreed. I'd been working on the assumption that tagging as horse=designated was in effect the same as designating the route as 'public bridleway'. I do however see the logic of adding designation tags and will do so with any further sections I tag - bridleway, footpath etc...
Regards.
Richard.