You surveyed two locations on different continents? Or was one done by mistake?

Hey. I'm curious about the Morani village added here. I can't seem to find any trace of it online and I don't see a source listed and not sure what your changeset message means. How do you know about Morani and is it verifiable?

Did you mean to change key to name instead of the value? This node doesn't make a lot of sense as is. I've updated to what I think you meant. Let me know if I misunderstood, though.

I'll restore the still relevant information.

It's appreciated to keep information updated, but in this scenario, it'd be better to remove just the names related to the business that doesn't exist. Things like the address are still useful unless the building is torn down entirely. Thanks!

I think there were just 3 duplicates. I've just removed them.

Whoops. I think we were both adding buildings at the same time. I'll defer to you for adding any. Feel free to remove the duplicates, or I'll check in later and remove any duplicates I find :)

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. However, please do not add people's personal information to their houses.

Thanks for your contribution! Though it looks like you set one of the foot paths as a bench. I fixed it, but wanted to let you know. Also, please avoid personal information added to the map, e.g. "Hannah's House".

Hey. You'd probably be better off putting these access restrictions on the ways that the nodes are a part of. I'm not sure many downstreams would even support this?

This is quite a large change without a specific changeset comment. Could you elaborate on what these changes are?

Hey. Some of the names on these areas seem suspiciously like descriptions. I was at the park earlier and definitely didn't see a name for the basketball court. Can you confirm these are just descriptions?

Hey. I see this is a pretty old thread, but just wanted to give a +1 on leaving any visible trails, even if people are not allowed on them, then giving them access=no. You might find it an uphill battle repeatedly deleting these trails, since people will come along, see the trail is unmapped, and map it, with no knowledge they were previously removed.

Thanks! I went ahead and fixed it.

Yeah, I'm just asking cause not:name= means that this isn't UCLA, which seems opposite of what you meant to tag? I think you probably mean to do short_name=UCLA

The source is accurate, an on-the-ground survey.

This is obviously not a trampoline park. I just hit the upload button too quick and left the old message there. This is actually just two adjacent bicycle parking stands at the Poway Library.

Could you elaborate on this changeset? It says to add "ucla" as an alternate name, but it is tagged as not:name. Did you mean short_name=?

I think a new changeset to fix it would be good. If you wanna do that, go for it. Otherwise, I can later.

Hey. How sure are you that the south side does not have a shared lane cycleway? It's been a couple weeks since I've driven here, but I do remember the "shared lane" markers on both sides. The relatively recent esri imagery also seems to show them. Just curious so I don't put wrong data in.