開放街圖標誌 OpenStreetMap 開放街圖

電子郵件圖示 藍天圖示 Facebook 圖示 LinkedIn 圖示 乳齒象圖示 Telegram 圖示 X 圖示

討論

star-one2010年01月21日 18時32分 發表的評論

personally i'd always favour - if i didn't have to pay for it at the point of use - using 'paid' / professional mapping for navigation software *where it matters* over using osm mapping, simply on the grounds that where osm is going to be 99% correct, it would be very annoying to end up taking a wrong turn due to the 1% wrong data that somebody - for any reason - could have added; the risk of pro mapping having errors is much lower than the risk of osm mapping having errors.

wieland2010年01月21日 20時15分 發表的評論

If OSM has 1% wrong data and pro mapping .5% wrong data, it will be easier for OSM to reach .1% than pro mapping to reach .1%.
Pro mapping has errors/wrong data too.

seav2010年01月22日 02時22分 發表的評論

At least in my country, Nokia's Navteq data is still using the no-good-for-navigation VMAP0 public domain dataset. So unless they manage to get better data, their map app is useless. A shame since Nokia is the #1 mobile phone manufacturer here.

dekarl2010年01月22日 09時14分 發表的評論

Had my first experiences with "professional maps" an turn-by-turn navigation last week... suggested 2 illegal turns in a 15km downtown tour... we can do better then that! (lucky me I was just letting the device suggest a route for fun)

marscot2010年01月22日 14時20分 發表的評論

http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/?mt0=googlemap&mt1=mapnik&lon=-4.08065&lat=55.89386&zoom=17 here where I can count 9 error on google map, osm even has house numbers here.

登入 來留下評論