I added building=construction for this building.

Thanks for identifying the mistake bye12. I would like to add "building= construction" tag to specify that this POI is not yet open. or construction=yes property. Does that sound good to you?

Hi alechuggins,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have used OSM Changeset Analyser https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55754326/ to review your edits in this changeset.

I observed that you have added a few overlapping ways, invalid maxheight tag to the primary highway nearby, a greeting in the name tag to a power line and an unverifiable water body along with a point of interest.

May I suggest http://learnosm.org/en/ for quickly getting started on common mapping practices on OSM. OSM wiki osm.wiki/Main_Page if you are interested in finding more information on mapping other features into OSM.

I reverted your changes to fix the data breakages in this changeset.

Thank you,

Manohar

Hi SandhyaK,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Great to see your interest in contributing to the map. I see that you have requested review.

I have used OSMCha (OpenStreetMap Changeset Analyzer) to review your edits. Here is the link to visualize your edits https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/52132314.

I have observed that you have dragged points in a few roads by accident. You can see how this changed the rendered map in https://tinyurl.com/y8b6ysqn (Github image). I have reverted this particular changeset to fix this issue. But otherwise, your other edits seem great and if you need further help, please feel free to ping or request a review.

Thanks,
Manohar

Hi mdejean,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is highly appreciated. Flagging this change from `route = ferry` to `route = tour`. A ferry route seems to be more appriopriate. I am not sure if a `route = tour` tag is valid.

Thanks,

Manohar

hi n76,
thanks for flagging and fixing the wrong turn restriction. this was a mistake.
Manohar

Hi wuj,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I see that you have requested review for your edits.

This is the turn restriction you have edited. osm.org/relation/7493764. I am guessing your intention is to deleted the restriction based on your changeset comment. But you have deleted only the via role in the relation and not the whole relation itself. In iD editor, one must delete all roles to delete the entire relation.

But the turn restriction itself seems to exist from Mapillary imagery. here is a picture in which the sign is visible. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=9To7LvH6PLsRIfvl0h_Esw&focus=photo.

I have restored the relation to previous correct state. please be sure to check on street imagery sources available to check for most recent ground truth. Satellite imagery can sometimes be outdated and misinforming. Please feel free to reply.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi Chris Lawrence,

Could I ask why you have changed the Dual carriage way of Golden gate bridge and made it a single way based dual road.

It has been mapped a dual carriageway by local community members.

Deleted way: osm.org/way/368033992/history

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi Jeremy Quanno,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is appreciated. But I am afraid this junction you added with motorways seems fictional and does not match with satellite imagery. May I encourage only adding real information to the map.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi sfontravel,

Can you also add building=yes tag to this feature osm.org/way/224050786/history. It is not rendering because it has no building tag even though you mapped it. https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8921295/31597052-f213f028-b263-11e7-8150-e1756cbeb1d7.png

thanks.

Manohar

Hi Gary Lipe,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Your addition in this changeset looks great.

Happy mapping,

Manohar

Hi Rolle,

This locality point is in the ocean, it would be great if you can correct.

Thanks,

Manohar

Thanks for getting back Steven L Goldberg. You can remove the road relation osm.org/relation/7538429#map=17/37.50963/-122.27580

Best,

Manohar

Hi DV1ABG,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I have observed that you have given numbers as names for these garden points you have mapped here. It would be great if you can remove the name tags.

Thanks,

Manohar

Welcome to OpenStreetMap hithere123. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Thanks for requesting a review.

I have observed that you have added a waterbody, a mixed wood, beach and a forest above the city plaza park.

It would be great if you can delete this features as they don't exist on the ground in truth. We only map what is there on the ground on OpenStreetMap.

Happy mapping and I hope you continue contributing to OpenStreetMap. Also I suggest http://learnosm.org/en/ for quickly getting started on tagging schema and common mapping practices.

Thank you,

Manohar

Hi AndrewSP37,

I have observed that this way osm.org/way/21350743 does not align with Bing satellite imagery which you mentioned as source. May I request if you have anyother source one can use to verify this change. It would be great if you can correct this highway and align to imagery if this was unintended.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi Preluwer,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing the map is greatly appreciated.

I see that you have requested a review for this changeset.
I have used OpenStreetMap changeset visualizer https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51738113 to look into the edits you have made in this changeset.

Amazing addition of buildings. But I have a small doubt. The numbers you have added to the buildings in the name tag. Like `name=107` for osm.org/way/521443701

If they are address house numbers, can you move them to address tags. More information on them here osm.wiki/Key:addr

Happy mapping,

Manohar

Hi climberko,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated.

I see that you have requested a review. I have used OpenStreetMap changeset analyzer https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51738116 to look through your edits. Amazing additions to the map and there seem to be no errors.

Happy mapping!

Manohar

Hi Ferjan83,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated.

I see that you have requested a review for this changeset.
I have used OpenStreetMap changeset visualizer https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51715468 to look into the edits you have made. Amazing additions and no errors.

If you are new to OSM, I suggest http://learnosm.org/en/ to quickly get started and to understand common mapping practices.

Happy mapping,

Manohar

Hi Sam van Asselt,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing the map is greatly appreciated. I see that you have requested a review for this changeset.

I have used OpenStreetMap changeset visualizer https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51715523 to look into the edits you have made. Amazing additions and no errors.

If you are new to OSM, I suggest http://learnosm.org/en/ to quickly get started and to understand common mapping practices.

happy mapping,

Manohar