Hi Foothills,

I read the discussion on your first changeset. And as it seems you have imported similar incompatible road set again into OSM. 1. Before importing any data into OSM, read up on what is procedure regarding imports, what data is acceptable on OSM. Read: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines 2. None of these tags that the features have any tags associated with OSM. "highway=collector" is not a valid tag. Reading: osm.wiki/Key:highway 3. A import is best done by merging with existing data. For example if you have better geometry, you can replace geometry of the existing data and keep the feature tags but not introduce duplicates.

I am raising this issue with Data Working Group.

Until your edits are cleanedup or merged please do not continue importing.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

hi Arungkaran,

These ponds do not exist according to the imagery. Are you sure these are water bodies.

Thanks.

Manohar

Can you correct road classification around this area osm.org/way/171433264/history is also not tertiary_link. Link roads are the small connecting exit roads.

Please tag these as unclassified

Hi Vijayotp,

I see that you have been mapping all along this coastline and mapping only tertiary roads. These are not tertiary roads. Please read osm.wiki/India:Tags/Highway

It would be great if you can correct this. Thank you.

Manohar

Hi secretlondon,

Shape of these buildings do not match satellite imagery. Getting the intrusions and extrusions of a complicated building is tedious. But the way you drew renders bad on the map. Check out these iD editor shortcuts osm.wiki/ID/Shortcuts to square out the buildings.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

Hi 25or6to4,
May I suggest smaller bbox approach in uploading edits.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi jryanart,

Welcome to OSM. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. Greate that you are contributing to HOT mapping tasks. But I have observed that you have delete the geometry of this road and made it a straight line. Verifying from satellite imagery this does not seem right. I have reverted your edit. If this is accidental, never mind. Please check before uploading your changes.

Best,

Manohar

Hi WWSS,

This relation is incomplete osm.org/relation/6990086#map=13/24.7827/121.5230. can you add in the missing segment

Thanks.

Best,
Manohar

Hi PeskyPotatoes,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. I observed that you have changed fundamental tags of Lake Loramie from landuse=reservoir to natural=water, water=lake. According to wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Loramie_State_Park the lake seems to be a storage reservoir and not a natural water body. Can you change the tags back.

Thanks.

Best,
Manohar

Fixed!

Hi Daichi Fujihara,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you have been updating wood relation osm.org/relation/5213073. I have observed few connectivity errors with the polygons. The inner polygons do not have to be connected to each other nor the outer boundary. These can be completely independent. The polygons that are inside the boundary fall are given an inner role while the boundary of the relation gets outer.

Reading: osm.wiki/Relation#Multipolygon

It would be great if you can correct the relation and update the relation.

Thanks. Let me know if you need any help. May I also suggest using JOSM editor instead of iD editor to work with relations as it provides advanced editing tools and members visualisation better.

Best,

Manohar

Hi jrome003,

Observed that you have contributed a good deal for the relation osm.org/relation/4614049. This relation is not closed and therefore incomplete. You might have knowledge of this place. May I request for an update to the relation.

Thanks!

Best,

Manohar

Hi Stara Zagora,

Observed that you have mapped and have been improving on forest relation osm.org/relation/6876317. It has a lot of intersection errors, unclosed polygons and this is the reason this is not rendering on OSM even though you went through the effort of mapping it. The inner polygon do not have to be attached to be each other nor the outer. The outer must be a boundary of the forest and inners are the areas we would like to exclude from this forest. Ex: Builtup area inside the forest. It would be great if you can correct this yourself to get a better understanding of working with relations. May I also suggest using JOSM editor instead of iD editor for working on relations. JOSM makes it easier to view the relation, members and errors that lie within the relation. Reading: osm.wiki/Relation#Multipolygon

Thanks. Let me know if you need any help.

Best,

Manohar

Hi Nrimbo,

Thanks for the detailed reply and your mapping effort. May I also suggest keeping the size of the bbox of changeset to a smaller size with constant uploading.

Best,

Manohar

May I suggest a descriptive changeset comment.
Thanks,

Manohar

Hi 느림보,

May I know why you deleted these relations that are administrative boundaries.

osm.org/relation/6940272/history

osm.org/relation/6937056/history

Best,
Manohar

Hi Hobbitdoug,

Welcome to Openstreetmap.Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. Please make sure that you map what is existing on the ground and not what you would like to have. You have used various types of tags in this area here I presume for finding pokemons. This is great. You can map so much on OSM using just these tags you already know. I hope you do as well. OSM is the biggest open map database there is. Anyone can edit, anyone can download. I hope you stick around and map more. This time for betterment of the map. Looking forward to see your edits.

Thanks. Best of luck.

Manohar

Since you have not replied, I had to go cleanup your edits. Please do continue to map. But I hope you understand why the quality of the data is given so much importance. Please read wiki.openstreetmap.org or osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide for guidance.

Good luck.

Best,
Manohar

Hi LorisO,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is highly appreciated. But I have observed that for this campsite you have a given a name in name:fr tag and a description in name tag. Can you change it actuall name in name tag as well. You can add description in description=* tag.

Best,

Manohar