Hi Jasonp1987,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest towards contributing to the map is appreciated. But the parks you seem to add are not actually parks. This one seems to be a regular residential area. You can map residential areas by using "landuse=residential". It would be great if you can correct your edits.

Thanks,

Manohar

It would be great if you can upload in smaller chunks and multiple changesets. Thanks.

Hi opengislab,

This might be an accidental error. But you have given ESRI SUCKS COPY THIS in the name tag for a few place objects you created here. This is a similar case with few other objects in other changesets as well.

May I know the source of this data?

Thanks,
Manohar

Hi Jahvinci,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you have been adding unverifiable water bodies along with this one in this changeset. I reverted your edits as these seemed unreasonable. Please do continue mapping but please only map what is existing on the map.

Thank you,

Manohar

Hi Aleix Nugon,

It would be great if you can. Google data is proprietary and not open data. This is the reason why the information from any Google product(maps,streetview) cannot be used on OSM due to license issues.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi Love Toys Ctg,

The correct tag for sex shops is shop=erotic. I corrected your edit. Can you confirm the name of the places here? if they are correct.

Thanks

Manohar

Hi Abderrahmane Benkhalifa,

These are way too many attractions, are you sure these are right?

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi asdunn,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. For buildings instead of area=yes, building=yes is the right tag. It would be great if you can correct.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi EmGee0430,

Nice job on building mapping here. If you can correct the overlapping buildings here that would be great.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi DaveHath,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Nice job here on building mapping. If you can fix the building overlapping issues here, that would be great.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi AragonChristopherR17Z,

I understand a large relation is manageable by splitting it into smaller relations. But the bay area relation here seems broken. May I suggest using JOSM for easier manipulation of relations. I understand that you have created these relations in the first place and maintain the relation. But the ways in the relation currently do not roles, the outers are not closed. I can definitely help you sort this bay area into a nice single relation that can be easier to be maintained over time. Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Manohar

This relation is now broken osm.org/relation/6579950

Hi Grand Homes,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I have observed that these ways you created here do not exist in the imagery and look very roughly mapped. I reverted your edits. But please talk a look at osm.wiki/Beginners'_guide

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi Hollywood Theater Burleson TX,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is greatly appreciated. But you deleted valid data here. If you are a local mapper, it would be greatly appreciated if you can improve your neighborhood. I am reverting your changeset as it deleted a lot of valid data.
This trunk road is one example osm.org/way/438458178/history

Best,

Manohar

Thank you. Cleared up.

Best,

Manohar

Hi ListenOrange,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is greatly appreciated. OSM aims to be a live map of the real world. Understand that your edits are useful for the wider audience and carry a great reach. If you were a user of OSM and relied on OSM for your daily map usages, knowing that a station you regularly travel by is deleted because of clutter does not seem reasonable. There are a lot of other ways you can contribute to the map. Ex: Adding roads and buildings in your neighborhood. Further you can micromap certain things like adding height information for buildings. There are a lot of exciting things and possibilities. But I would not suggest deleting already mapped features for aesthetic or personal purposes.

Thanks.

Manohar

Hi wolfbert,

Observed that this changeset was open for more than 2hrs and the changeset seems to have touched a large area. Just leaving a note here to confirm if this was an intended behaviour.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi carmenhotel,

You do not need to add + instead space between words in name tag. I have observed that you have been adding POIs with similar plus signs in name tags. Can you correct these? From the metadata, it appears that the changeset is created_by carmenhotel@milestoneinternet.com. Can you give more information? Is this POI information coming from carmenhotel database?

Thanks!

Manohar

You just added building=yes tag to osm.org/relation/544731

hi timwenzel98,

Is this import of elevation tags discussed and documented somewhere?

Thanks,

Manohar