manoharuss's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
45864462 | over 8 years ago | Hi hkmpr, The ice skating track you added here into the relation will render it like an island. Check out this image (https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8921295/22681395/f7bc6eac-ed32-11e6-8034-588bb341e4db.png). So I have removed the membership in the relation but the track itself exists. Best, Manohar |
45768443 | over 8 years ago | Hi LaserManiac, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your contributions to OSM are appreciated. It has been great to see new users show interest in OSM and map their neighborhoods. But I have found few issues I would like to raise. This is not a park osm.org/way/225823488/history as observed from Satellite imagery. I corrected this as this is a big feature easily visible on the map. This does not seem like a bridleway osm.org/way/468970368/history. See osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway. This is too small for a forest osm.org/way/471694428. Try natural=wood. This looks like a footway and not residential osm.org/way/365600569/history. There are other minor issues. It would be great if you can correct these issues. Let me know what you think. Best, Manohar |
45652614 | over 8 years ago | Hi Tykim, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest to contribute to OSM is highly appreciated. It has been great to see new mappers joining OSM and mapping their neighborhoods. But these `landuse=forest` tags you added do not seem reasonable. As these are really small. May be osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass? Feel free to reply or message me personally if you need help. Best, Manohar |
45675445 | over 8 years ago | Hi rlarjsdn, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is highly appreciated. It is great to see new mappers joining us and mapping their neighborhood. But this building here is intersecting with the roads and does not seem to exist in the satellite imagery as well. It would be great if you can verify once more and map accordingly. Best, Manohar |
45452054 | over 8 years ago | Hi Will Sterling, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is appreciated. It is great to see new users mapping and taking care of their neighborhoods. But the park you mapped here looks jagged and you have done other changes like changing the Olen Mattingly Road to a waterway. It would be great if you can correct these. Also check out OSM wiki for mapping different kind of features. Why not make your neighborhood the best on OSM right. Local mapping is the best one can do to ground truth and improve OSM. Feel free to get back or message me. Best, Manohar |
45042417 | over 8 years ago | I have deleted your mapped object. Please do not continue mapping for PokemonGO. |
45463473 | over 8 years ago | Hi calexandermen, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is appreciated. But the park and meadow you have mapped does not seem right. This seems like a residential area from satellite imagery. This seems like a PokemonGo related mapping. I suggest you go through osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide before continuing mapping further. Best, Manohar |
45463407 | over 8 years ago | Hi Kairi13, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions to OSM are appreciated. But look at your changeset here http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45463407/. This is a global map database. May I suggest looking at wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide to quickly get accustomed to mapping on OSM. Best, Manohar |
45405351 | over 8 years ago | Hi muzirian, May I suggest not having the tamil version of the name in the "name=*" tag considering we do also have name:ta translation for the same node. Best, Manohar |
45420892 | over 8 years ago | Hi lferreyra, Appreciate your mapping activity and contributions to OSM. But you did leave
Best, Manohar |
45418172 | over 8 years ago | Hi thatmoodieguy, Welcome to OSM. Your interest in contributing to OSM is appreciated. But I have reverted your changeset because you have mapped overlapping footways, given natural=water tag to a building etc. Please make sure when you map, that you connect these footways to existing footways, see appropriate tags in the wiki(osm.wiki/Map_Features). When in doubt search for the feature tag in the wiki and you have a lot of help with pictures and examples. Thank you. Happy mapping. Best, Manohar |
44723167 | over 8 years ago | Hi Siewjy, Looking at https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#44723167. May I ask why you deleted these buildings? Best, Manohar |
44940003 | over 8 years ago | Hi Glass Cup, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. This way you added here is crossing with itself in several places, crossing with a building. osm.org/way/463978015 It would be if you can correct these and in general also keep the ways into smaller segments which would be easier for corrections. Best, Manohar |
44989682 | over 8 years ago | Hi Bored, Looking at https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#44989682 All of these ways you have deleted seemed to exist in the imagery with appropriate feature tags. If they are well mapped, exist on the ground (be it for private use which is also tagged) how are they unnecessary? Best, Manohar |
44993830 | over 8 years ago | Hi user983427120, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. But the buildings, parking area you have deleted here do indeed exist according to Bing imagery. It would be great if you can remap them back. Thank you. Best, Manohar |
45262395 | over 8 years ago | Hi esunget, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. But I have found issues in this changeset I would like to share. osm.org/way/466843872 this way has footway=crossing, crossing=zebra for the whole way. These tags are ideal for only the section of the way mapped over the zebra crossing. Read osm.wiki/Key:crossing. Let me know if you have any questions. Please correct your edits wherever necessary. Thank you. Best, Manohar |
45245351 | over 8 years ago | Hi Andrey Steklo, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But you have given the whole address in the addr:street tag which I corrected here osm.org/node/4614154594. best, Manohar |
45150482 | over 8 years ago | Hi Andrew Matheny, Some of the imported buildings have overlaps with some highways in this changeset. The highways themselves are misaligned and not the buildings imported. It would be great if you can align these. Best, Manohar |
45076239 | over 8 years ago | Hi Arthurian Arthur, Your contributions to OpenStreetMap are greatly appreciated. But I see some issues with the mapping here. You have added so many trunk roads here(osm.org/way/465184630#map=19/-18.38813/21.84731), which do not seem like trunk roads at all. There were previously mapped highways on which your edits are overlapping. There are buildings as well which are overlapping(osm.org/way/465184628). It would be if you can correct your edits. Feel free to reply. Best, Manohar |
45101652 | over 8 years ago | Hi Herison Teixeira, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in mapping is greatly appreciated. But Google is a proprietary database from which one cannot copy map into OpenStreetMap. Can you confirm that this is not the case here? Best, Manohar |