Hi calubi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. I have observed that in this changeset you have deleted these exisiting buildings and added your own traces of these buildings in other changesets (www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43263396, www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43263509). It is highly appreciated that you are adding new data here with street names, house numbers. But it is also suggested that you merge this data of yours with existing buildings. Would be great to know more information through your changeset comment as well. You are doing great work through your mapping. Would be nice if you can express that with reasonable changeset comments for others to understand your work. Feel free to comment and let me know what you think.

Best,
Manohar

@zeromap starting to understand the problem. This point is now a hamlet(osm.org/changeset/43342659) and wikidata I added was deleted, according to our discussion. But now, I feel like the census and population tags which are at 20658 does not correspond to this hamlet but indeed the town. Can you take a look into details of the hamlet here if you are a local and change population accordingly. Thank you.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Lourence,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that there are buildings that are crossing highways. I have checked the tms layer you have used and it seems the previously traced roads do not align with the imagery like the buildings you have traced. Can you align the roads as well?
Feel free to reply and let me know.
Best,
Manohar

@zeromap Thanks for keeping an eye out. The point location from satellite imagery does seem like a hamlet as in small number of buildings around the intersection along the roads. Do you think it would be a good idea to tag the point as a hamlet and remove the wikidata tag I added?

Best,
Manohar

@SomeoneElse

Thanks for leaving a message. I lost track of this changeset and was able to get back because you commented. I have looked through all the edits of Lafeer and found them to be inconsistent. Since the user has not many edits, I was able to download all his edits using Overpass. I have jotted down my observations in a gist and opened a public github issue in Mapbox repository to track progress on this. It would be great if you can take a look into the issue and gist linked in the issue https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241
Feel free to respond on the Github issue.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Suryo Adhy Chandra,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that this POI you mapped "Indomaret" is located on the road. It would be great if you correct the position of the POI.

Cheers,
Manohar Erikipati

Hi dannykath,

This was a mistake on my part. I have observed that my JOSM account setup was not changed after uploading above changesets and later changed it to my personal account(osm.org/user/manoharuss/history). I will make sure to not repeat this mistake. Thanks for keeping an eye.

Regards,
Manohar

Hi Muhammad Shaaban,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have deleted a mosque. May I know the reason behind this.

Cheers,
Manohar

Hi Vincent Dechenaux,

Sorry for the late reply and sure. I see that you are using JOSM. As long as the import is going to help the map and the source of the import is listed osm.wiki/Import/ or the license of the import is okay to be imported into OSM, I have no problem fixing this. Please confirm the source is listed in the import catalogue. I will go ahead merging buildings and aligning them to the imagery. If you want to take a stab at it, do so too. If the import is not discussed, I am afraid the changeset have to be reverted. Let me know by replying.

Cheers,
Manohar

Hi Sofm,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I observed that you have added a theatre in the Sundarbans. This does not seem reasonable. Do you have a source for this that could be verified? Let me know.

Cheers,
Manohar

Hi Vincent Dechenaux,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that these buildings you imported are not aligning with the imagery, also this import does have unmerged buildings. It would be great if you can merge these and align. Feel free to comment and reply.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Kyle Snyder,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. It is awesome that you are contributing to HOT projects. I have observed that there are few buildings which are crossing in this changeset. Can you check this place once please. Thank you. Happy mapping.

Best,
Manohar

Hi 工場長,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you are adding points of interest with multi-lingual names in the name tag. There is a combination of english/japanese/mandarin in the name tags of the points. You can add name:ja for japanese,name:en for english,name:zh for chinese. Please correct your edits.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Lafeer,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have added so many ATMs with numbers as their names. If these are personal place bookmarks, these should not have been uploaded to OSM. If these ATMs are correct, it would be great if you can delete the name tags from these points of interest. Feel free to reply.

Best,
Manohar

Hi msyam,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have added numbers to POIs names. The name tag is to specify the name of the business or establishment, not numbers. It would be great if you can fix this or I would have to revert your changeset completely.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Inayat Ur Rahman,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have observed that you have been adding year+personal names to all of the guest houses, pubs you have mapped. This is not a good practice. Since OpenStreetMap is a public mapping database, everyone who is using OpenStreetMap based services or OpenStreetMap itself will see these points of interest and get confused. I would like it if you fix your edits and they are so many. Let me know the reason behind why you added personal names in the name tag for these points.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Barlanki,

I have reverted this changeset here (osm.org/changeset/41792504). It has been 1month since you have closed this changeset and your edits were still on the map. This is a public database and all the OSM users see the objects you map. @indigomc @yogi_ks I had to revert the whole changeset. The nodes were too many and spread across a long area to consider filtering them out manually.

Best,
Manohar

Hi scai,

Thanks for your comment, otherwise I would not have known my mistake. My intention was to fix the relation (osm.org/relation/3753553) as it was incomplete and cross interesecting at a place. The members of the relation did not have roles either. During that I accidentally deleted natural=coastline tag as you have mentioned. Again thanks for letting me know.

I have checked and it seems natural=coastline was restored by Dmgroom in this changeset osm.org/changeset/41732133.

I will be more careful this time.

Cheers,
Manohar

Hi ItalianMustache,

Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I I have observed that you have created a broken multi polygon. This is the relation id osm.org/relation/6431853. This is the reason why this swamp is not being rendered on OSM. Do you want to fix this or do you want me to delete this for you. Feel free to reply.

Best,
Manohar

Hi Airlobster,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you removed "natural=water". I have looked through the imagery and the area seems to be dry. But if this is a season change you can add "intermittent=yes" tag to the waterbody instead of deleting it. Information regarding this on the wiki(osm.wiki/Key:water). Deleting a waterbody between seasons is counterintuitive. Let me know what you think. Feel free to comment here.

Best,
Manohar