Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Weekly roundup - Suspicous mapping

Publicado por manoharuss el 21 junio 2016 en English.

The amount of data on OSM sometimes boggles the mind, there was 23471 new changesets just yesterday. With so much great mapping work being done by the community, there’s always a possibility of a few bad apples. So, here’s a collection of a few that I have stumbled across last week (13 - 17 June).

screenshot 2016-06-21 17 36 49

Stumbled on anything suspicous on the map this week? Do drop the mapper a message, for all you know, it was just an honest mistake :) Look forward to another roundup next week.

Ícono de correo electrónico Icono de Bluesky Ícono de Facebook Ícono de LinkedIn Ícono de Mastodon Ícono de Telegram Ícono X

Discusión

Comentario de jonwit el 21 de junio de 2016 a las 17:58

I feel some hatred towards central place theory hexagonal hinterlands.

Comentario de Piskvor el 21 de junio de 2016 a las 20:21

Is that Settlers of Catan? ;) But what I wanted to mention is something else: since maps.me have introduced editing from inside their app (two months back?), I’ve seen - in my area of interest - multiple edits adding Chinese equivalents to local names, or people adding personal notes there.

I’m thinking this might be a localisation/user education problem: multiple people seem to have come to the conclusion that maps.me (and by extension, OSM) is the correct place to put their subjective notes (e.g. “my house”); it’s always the “name” tag, the change text is always Chinese. and created_by is always a recent version of maps.me. I don’t have enough data yet to infer more, but it’s disconcerting that others see a similar pattern elsewhere.

Iniciar sesión para dejar un comentario