Doporučil bych označit řádně pomocí tagu osm.wiki/Cs:Key:construction
Spolu s označením datumu znovuotevření osm.wiki/Cs:Key:opening_date

Ohledně Fixme bodu osm.org/node/3163458281: "upřesnit adresní body: přechod Dominikánská-Šilingr. nám."

Takové poznámky se daávaji do poznámek osm.wiki/Cs:Pozn%C3%A1mky

Dobrý den. Než začnete přispívat, prosím seznamte se s pravidly, která nám pomáhají vytvořit kavlitní mapu kvalitními přispěvky.
osm.wiki/Cs:Zapojit_se
Vandalizmus nebude tolerován.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159454543

Dobrý den. Než začnete přispívat, prosím seznamte se s pravidly, která nám pomáhají vytvořit kavlitní mapu kvalitními přispěvky.
osm.wiki/Cs:Zapojit_se

Odstranil jsem chybne cislo popisne. Presmyslel jsem nad tim proc jsem se ho ta pokusil vyplnit - asi jsem si myslel ze ho pridavam k nodu CNB (kde ma smysl byt vyplnenou adresu ikdyz existuje adresni bod) ale pridal jsem to omylem k budove protoze CNB je ocividne samostatny bod.

Ahoj. To, jak jsi vyplnil name: , predpokladam, ze neni skutecne jmeno, cili to patri spis do note:

Jelikož tam je editor Vespucci a source:survey tak osobně, ale očividně mi někde vypadlo lomítko. Vidím, že tam jsou označeny dvě adresy (jsou tam dva vchody), tak se zajdu podívat jaké číslo má ten hlavní.

Hi. Thank you for improving the map. However, please don't fill in name unless its a proper name. Please, see a guide here: osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide
I've corrected some things ( you can see my changes here https://osmcha.org/changesets/154701745 ) that you may have been done by accident so please check them. It would be great if you could connect the path to other roads. Thanks again and happy mapping.

natural=beach je podle definice na OSM wiki geologický útvar. Asi bude vhodnější regreační označení leisure=beach_resort Také viz právě probíhající diskuze na https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4028#mce2429

Good catch. Reverted osm.org/changeset/143776866

Revert of 90421263

I am surprised tile info is info filled in at all, although with that kind of range, not sure if that useful. It's the sharpest quality in this area which usually means its more recent than lower quality ones and it appears to be similar to Maxar.

What made me think those edits are automated was the amount of mistakes I've seen in the HOTOSM task areas. I don't think I have seen that many in one place. Do you happen to be using RapID and accepting any house that is sugsted (purple color) by the editor?

Hi. You are doing obviously automated edits given the number of changesets in such a short time, for which there are some rules osm.wiki/Automated_edits
Many edits such as this one are low quality. Your computer vision model appears to be very eager to mark any smudge as a building and there seem to be noone verifying the changes. Please explain these changes and remove them if they have been done in error.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124968922

Hi. You are doing obviously automated edits given the number of changesets in such a short time, for which there are some rules osm.wiki/Automated_edits
Many edits such as this one are low quality. Your computer vision model appears to be very eager to mark any smudge as a building and there seem to be noone verifying the changes. Please explain these changes and remove them if they have been done in error.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124968922

Wrong description. Actually added some detail along the coast and added roads and driveways

Hi. You have left some duplicate nodes of way nodes in your edit.
way node: osm.org/node/9872527555
duplicate node: osm.org/node/9872684852
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123324578

Are you sure there is waste disposal here in the middle of sand? osm.org/node/9759592017
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121285016

Hi. It seems you've duplicated a river and added duplicate nodes. Probably due to JOSM not showing all changes that were to be submitted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121620494

Some accident with moving a node happened here osm.org/node/4437377505
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121241401