metatechs Blogeintrag-Kommentare

Änderungssatz	Zeitpunkt	Kommentar
119949091	vor etwa 3 Jahren	Merci d'avoir corrigé le nom de la rue du Vieilahaut, j'y suis passé aujourd'hui, et je confirme que le nom dans OSM correspond bien maintenant à celui sur le panneau :-)
119949091	vor etwa 3 Jahren	Rh
67447958	vor über 3 Jahren	L'atlas vicinal de 1841 n'est pas une source appropriée pour OpenStreetMap, si le chemin n'existe plus sur le terrain. OSM n'est pas un lieu pour ressusciter des vieux chemins, qui ne sont plus empruntables. Il faut d'abord qu'ils soient restaurés sur le terrain pour les rendre à nouveau praticables, comme le fait par exemple l'association www.chemins141.be. Merci.
59221689	vor über 4 Jahren	Hello, Yes, you're right, I was probably overzealous with tags, not knowing whether those devices behave the same in all countries. I remove the tag. Mappingly yours,
67447958	vor fast 6 Jahren	Hi, Are you sure this track "Sentier n°91" really exists on the ground ? osm.org/way/672190265 And also the other tracks which you added around there ? Because I walked by today on "chemin n°14" and "chemin n°50" and did not see them. The following rules of OSM "On the Ground Rule" and "Don't map historic events and historic features" recommend to map ways which are not visible anymore in "Open Historical Map". osm.wiki/Good_practice I asked the same question on changeset osm.org/changeset/67084631, but did not receive an answer. Thanks.
67449158	vor fast 6 Jahren	Hi, Are you sure this track really exists on the ground ? osm.org/way/672195642/history The following rules of OSM "On the Ground Rule" and "Don't map historic events and historic features" recommend to map ways which are not visible anymore in "Open Historical Map". osm.wiki/Good_practice I asked the same question on changeset osm.org/changeset/67084631, but did not receive an answer. Thanks.
67084631	vor etwa 6 Jahren	Hi, Are you sure this track really exists on the ground ? And also the other tracks which you added around there ? Because I walked by today on "chemin n°5" and did not see them. The following rules of OSM "On the Ground Rule" and "Don't map historic events and historic features" recommend to map ways which are not visible anymore in "Open Historical Map". osm.wiki/Good_practice Thanks.
17061193	vor über 6 Jahren	Hi IIVQ, thanks for the comment. It was my first month of mapping, 5 years ago... In the mean time, I think I better understand the tags meanings, but I do not remember all the work I did in the beginning that I should enhance...
43766194	vor etwa 7 Jahren	Hello, I noticed that you removed the 2 names for each side of this street : osm.org/way/92242671 Did you see anything new during a survey ? If no, what is the source of your change ? Thanks, metatech
30963533	vor über 7 Jahren	Yes, there 2 names on this way, but on the visual map, the street name is empty, which is not really human-friendly... maybe Osmose should be improved to cope with this same special case...
30963533	vor über 7 Jahren	Hi, Is it Osmose which suggests to remove the street name when there is a different name on for the left and the right part of the street ? This looks strange... osm.org/way/103435539
20757643	vor über 7 Jahren	Hello, just for your info, I removed 3 bollars which were most probably errors, or temporary works finished by now : osm.org/changeset/20757643 osm.org/node/2688790571 osm.org/node/2688790569
52273309	vor über 7 Jahren	Hello, I surveyed yesterday in Incourt the street you named "Rue d'Incourt". The street sign actually is named after "Place". osm.org/way/37593256 Why did you change it ? What is your source ? Thanks...
47390298	vor über 7 Jahren	Hello, I surveyed yesterday "Rue du pré saint jean" and I changed the name to "Rue des Prés". Where did you find this name ?
46424905	vor über 8 Jahren	This appears with the non-default "transport" layer : osm.org/#map=12/50.8475/4.3719&layers=T
46424905	vor über 8 Jahren	Hello, The new "place=suburb" appears in large letters at zoom level 9 to 12. Probably "place=neighbourhood" is better ? Thanks.
33339204	vor fast 10 Jahren	Hello IloveOSM. In this changeset, you changed the one-way restrictions on way 364983467 and 92435920, although I had surveyed them personally last week and they were encoded correctly. I sent you a personal message yesterday but you did not reply yet. Without any response in the coming days, I will revert the changes which do not reflect the reality on the ground. Please reply to my personal message or to this discussion. Thanks. metatech
30065065	vor über 10 Jahren	Bonjour, Est-ce que ce changement résulte d'une visite sur le terrain ? Il y a quelques mois, ce tronçon de Ravel était en travaux pour égoûttage. Avez-vous vu personnellement que les travaux étaient finis ? Il n'y a pas de commentaire aux changements qui permettrait de l'établir... Merci d'avance,