Hey, no worries! I figured it was something like a mistap or choosing the next option in the list accidentally, but I also didn’t want to just change it without checking in ☺️

I love to see these kinds of surveys! Thanks for doing it! We need more of this in Winnipeg :D

Great change! Beat me to it. :D

I see that you added review_requested. This change looks good to me! Great speed and accuracy.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144308228

Source: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/CA/MB/CA-MB-WT-Analysis.html#bus_74

Hi FlySkyline! Why did you choose "surface"="concrete:lanes" for these sidewalks? Based on the wiki (osm.wiki/Tag:surface%3Dconcrete:lanes), I think you may have wanted just "surface"="concrete".

There seem to be quite a few sidewalks around Winnipeg that are tagged like this. I just picked this particular changeset arbitrarily.

Ah, thank you for catching that. That was a bad copy-paste from the filters panel in JOSM. I’ll adjust that and go over my recent changesets to see if there are any other issues.

The 2022 page mentions "Listed below are the community presentations of NYC DOT projects implemented in 2022".

Rather than you making the changes using Google Street View, which I know you wouldn't do because that's expressly forbidden, why not revert your revert and let my changes stand? Not an ego thing, happy to have you make the changes (I know you do a lot of work in the Brooklyn area) but I based these changes on my own eyes.

Great, love to hear it! For simplicity, let's consolidate discussion on osm.org/changeset/133346576

I drove there a few days ago and noticed the changes in the lane paint as well as the *New* sub-sign under the No Left Turns signs visible. That's why there's a "source=survey" tag on the changeset.

You can see the proposed construction here: https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/kings-hwy-ave-j-e98-st-cb18-jan2021.pdf

You can see here that it was implemented in 2022: https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/about/projects-2022.shtml

If you are looking at free and open street imagery, feel free to link it here. If you're looking at the likely non-open street imagery, there are views from November 2022 that shows it is completed.

👋 Hi there! I'm just curious about a maxspeed change you made. Is that section of Willson Place really signed as 30 km/h? I know that the City announced some changes just recently, but that seems like an unusual road to be slowed down permanently.

If you're going to revert this, it's helpful if you explain *how* previous info was more accurate.

Additionally, I answered the question that you left only 4 hours ago on my changeset, where I explained that the road lanes and turn restrictions have actually been adjusted since what you mapped.

Are you comfortable reverting this revert, or would you like to talk about it more?

Satellite imagery is out of date, plain and simple. Kings Highway was updated recently to remove left turning as an option at several intersections to improve traffic flow.

@Osmonde: Let me know what you think of this update: osm.org/changeset/112763823

I see that there *is* still a median, so it should be drawn as two ways.

I definitely was using outdated imagery for the road geometry, though. I'll fix that right now. Feel free to adjust it further.

Hey @Osmonde!

I had noticed that the 2019-2020 construction project for Empress Street, Empress Street East, Eastway, Westway, and Saint John Ambulance Way was not fully reflected in OpenStreetMap.

Most of my work in adding the results of that construction project were focused on everything *north* of Portage Avenue. It's possible that I was mistaken on what happened south of Portage Avenue. Please feel free to correct any placement based on imagery or bad memory on my part.

> Do you think two separate ways for empress st is still necessary after the reconstruction?

If there is any median, then it should be drawn as two ways. If the only thing separating the two directions is paint, then it should be drawn as one way.

Again, if I got it wrong, feel free to fix it. (Or let me know, and I'll fix it the next time that I drive by there)

I know that the name:pronounciation key needs IPA instead of phonetics, but I don't know IPA. I hope that someone else can come along and help here.

@user_5359: I deleted "backward" or "forward" from "lanes:bus:backward"

Oh my goodness, yes, that's exactly what I mean.

In way #803488006, the lane:turns and turn:lanes keys are mixed up. They've been fixed in changeset #85166298