mf8s003j's Comments
Changeset | Nə vaxt | Şərh |
---|---|---|
167372827 | about 1 month ago | This changeset just completely detached several bus routes. So many of your changesets have been so destructive. It's really frustrating. |
166001711 | 2 months ago | @Roydon Olive I realized as I was going to bed last night that I didn't direct my frustration correctly towards the vandal. Thank you for fixing up their vandalism! |
166001711 | 2 months ago | Your change created so much extra work fixing all the bus routes in and out of Kildonan Place. |
163371142 | 2 months ago | This "no left turn" doesn't exist on this intersection. The "no left turn" sign is attached to the traffic signal pole, showing that the traffic signal cut in the median is for buses existing the bus plaza. It also makes no sense to add a "no left turn" restriction while still keeping the one-way median cut-through. |
159372528 | 8 months ago | Hey, thank you so much for catching that! |
157108721 | 10 months ago | Thanks mate! Really appreciate that |
156871696 | 10 months ago | That's a great idea. I will make that change. |
156871696 | 10 months ago | The legal description is not the usual axles. It is 6 total tyres. From the bylaw quoted in the changeset source: "No person shall operate a truck or truck tractor, which has more than six tires, along Jubilee Avenue, unless the vehicle is conducting business on Jubilee Avenue or on streets in the vicinity of Jubilee Avenue where Jubilee Avenue is the shortest routing to or from a Truck Route." Signage at the on-ramps has an indicator for "Yes trucks" with a placard for "Max 6 tires" I know that nowhere else in the world uses maxtyres, which is why I also tagged it with hgv=no, since that seems like the closest tag that's actually in use that won't get people in trouble with the law. |
154463545 | 11 months ago | Hey Spacelist, in OpenStreetMap, if a name can be spelled without an abbreviation, we don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily shorten words, but not the other way. (The most common example there is that St would be Street or Saint) osm.wiki/Abbreviations has more guidelines. |
155898273 | 11 months ago | Hi JiahuiY, you're continuing to move roads without aligning your editor to GPS traces. I already asked you in osm.org/changeset/155082621 to align your editor's offset using GPS traces. These roads are already very very well placed and surveyed, including the Trans-Canada Highway in this changeset. It did not suddenly move by 5 or 10 metres. |
155432948 | 12 months ago | These changes are also failing this automated validation that we have set up: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/CA/MB/CA-MB-WT-Analysis.html |
155432948 | 12 months ago | Hi! Those bus route names are explicitly chosen to be descriptive. The 'name' field of the bus route should follow a specific format and is not the official name of the bus route. That comes from the guidance at osm.wiki/Buses The actual route name is already stored in gtfs:route_long_name which gets automatically updated from Winnipeg Transit's own data every 3 months. The route number is stored in gtfs:route_id The idea behind that guideline was to make route relations discernible whenever an editor or a changeset page on osm.org displays a list of relations. For this one feature type only, we're supposed to use the name tag to describe the feature. Apps don't actually use the `name` field on bus routes. |
155082621 | 12 months ago | Hi JiahuiY! It looks like you moved Plessis Road about 10 metres west of where it was. However, it doesn't seem like that matches with GPS traces. I want to confirm with you: when you move highways, do you align your background images with GPS traces first? Bing Maps in particular are not usually accurately positioned, at least around the Winnipeg area. |
152861812 | about 1 year ago | Thanks again @fudoreaper for catching this. |
150187446 | about 1 year ago | Oh, awesome. Thank you! I'm quite embarrassed now with the assumptions I made! Thanks for updating the map and for responding! |
150187446 | about 1 year ago | Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Is the slip lane from northbound St Mary's Road onto eastbound Dakota Street really gone? I know that the City has been redoing that intersection recently, but I'm always surprised when the City agrees to remove a slip lane. If it is truly gone, there's also a turn restriction at the intersection itself (relation 6966074) that should be removed, and I suppose that the crosswalk across the former slip lane should also be cleaned up. I see that you're new to editing OpenStreetMap! Again, welcome. I'm happy to show you how to make those additional changes, or just make the changes myself once I go see them in person, if that's easier for you. |
136549119 | over 1 year ago | Hey, no worries! I figured it was something like a mistap or choosing the next option in the list accidentally, but I also didn’t want to just change it without checking in ☺️ |
150549295 | over 1 year ago | I love to see these kinds of surveys! Thanks for doing it! We need more of this in Winnipeg :D |
144308228 | over 1 year ago | Great change! Beat me to it. :D |
144308228 | over 1 year ago | I see that you added review_requested. This change looks good to me! Great speed and accuracy.
|