naoliv's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
65714921 | over 6 years ago | Thanks! |
65568310 | over 6 years ago | syberdyner, procure não grudar as áreas nas ruas, que isso não é correto.
|
65663458 | over 6 years ago | MAALIN22, from where you are importing this data, please? |
65550874 | over 6 years ago | Hello, nlehuby. It seems that you are doing an automated editing and removing sport=swimming from pools. Regardless of whether the pool is private or not, it seems that there is no problem in having sport=swimming in them; people swim and practice swimming even if the pool is private, right? I don't know if you are aware of it, but it's good to read osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct before continuing such edits. It's also good to discuss such mass modifications with the community, before simply removing/modifying a tag. Can we revert these edits? Automatic translation below
Il semble que vous êtes en train de faire un montage automatisé et de supprimer sport=swimming des piscines. Que la piscine soit privée ou non, il semble qu'il n'y ait pas de problème à avoir le sport=swimming en eux; les gens nagent et pratiquent la natation même si la piscine est privée, non? Je ne sais pas si vous êtes au courant, mais il est bon de lire osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct avant de continuer ces modifications. Il est également bon de discuter de telles modifications de masse avec la communauté, avant de simplement supprimer/modifier une tag. Pouvons-nous revenir ces modifications ? |
65458842 | over 6 years ago | Maybe it's necessary to better verify paths like this osm.org/way/654844805
|
65460576 | over 6 years ago | Hi, MTG5093
|
65448364 | over 6 years ago | This probably reverts all of #65397498 |
65443203 | over 6 years ago | This probably reverts all of #65397318 |
65438412 | over 6 years ago | This probably reverts all of #65397150 |
65433635 | over 6 years ago | This probably reverts all of #65397003 |
65430149 | over 6 years ago | This probably reverts all of #65396785 |
65427604 | over 6 years ago | This probably reverts all of #65396627 |
65397150 | over 6 years ago | Great!
|
65397150 | over 6 years ago | If you can get in touch with them to clarify that, it'll be perfect. In the meantime, can we revert this import? There are places where the inserted data got duplicated with the objects that were already on the map. For example, this address already existed osm.org/way/616966931 and you inserted the same at osm.org/node/6132038786 It might be interesting to discuss about this import, in a first moment, in the Canadian mappers list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca or in the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=16 Of course, by having the license information and checking a way to not duplicate the data (and avoid some other possible inconsistencies), we can reinsert this data later into OpenStreetMap. Is that okay for you? |
65397150 | over 6 years ago | Right.
Imports, especially like this one, should be discussed first. For this specific case it is also good to read osm.wiki/OpenAddresses.io The other part is that I could not find any information about the license or the terms of use of this data in any of the following places: http://results.openaddresses.io/sources/ca/on/leeds_grenville https://github.com/openaddresses/openaddresses/blob/master/sources/ca/on/leeds_grenville.json https://services3.arcgis.com/KQcdsE7S72bcD7R8/ArcGIS/rest/services/CivicAddress/FeatureServer/0 https://www.leedsgrenville.com/en/services/maps-and-gis.aspx Do you know any place where we could get such information, please? |
65397150 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Shane.
|
65041012 | over 6 years ago | Yockie, what is the source you are using to import this data, please? |
65169617 | over 6 years ago | João, o que você quis fazer nessa sua edição, por favor?
|
65086356 | over 6 years ago | Don't do this, please.
|
65056357 | over 6 years ago | 👌 |