My wild guess: it was an import
osm.org/changeset/18487977

In my defense, I took a first look using the map with a low zoom level.
And it seems that it was in Germany :-)

Only the node was modified, and not the way osm.org/node/45951546/history That is why we see the way with 4 years old.

Note that by adding entries citing the spams you also increase the noise in the diary.
If somebody is reading your post about the spam, most probably they also also saw the spam (thus it’s not needed to write about them).

Tomio, não to achando no mapa o lugar onde vai ter festa pra comemorar :-P

Hum… pra esse caso ficou bom mesmo.

É tudo pontual ou você que filtrou só essa parte?

It’s necessary to care some care before using it in OSM.
See https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/17550/can-i-import-cc-by-sa-data-into-openstreetmap and osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

Muito bom, Tomio!
Fico feliz que eu não sou o único que fica indo e voltando que nem bobo no mesmo lugar :-P

Sai fora. Pra homem é só aperto de mão e olha lá hahahahahahaha

6 - Via Local ou Estrada Vicinal

Narcélio, precisa ter cuidado que a “Creative Commons Atribuição 2.5 Brasil License” requer atribuição:

Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de maneira alguma que sugira ao licenciante a apoiar você ou o seu uso.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/br/

Dá uma olhada em https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/17550/can-i-import-cc-by-sa-data-into-openstreetmap e osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility que não parece ser compatível

There is https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/841

For launchpad’s JOSM translation you want this:

https://translations.launchpad.net/josm/trunk/+pots/josm/de/+filter?person=x-launchpad-r

Martijn, any news about using tracks from OSM to find unmapped ways?
Were you able to get a fresh GPX dump?

Bonix, tem um em osm.wiki/Pt:Contact#Telegram já

This is “mapping for the router”.
Like people said before, the routing program should be able to deal with the private roads (and you should just not remove this info from them).

👽

“I’ll be going to each of the picnic sites and look for re-tagging it.” gives the impression that you will manually verify each one, while in https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/147#issuecomment-166525158 we can see that “it will be a mechanized edit”.

It’s good to make it explicit that it will be an automatic process.
Also, whether possible, add mechanical=yes to the changeset.

@mmd hummmmm…. because I didn’t know that it was possible :-)
Really good to know. Thanks!