https://binged.it/2tjGxQ7 - is the gate new?

Looking on Bing I can see the no-entry to St Augustine's Parade -- but there's no one-way signs on the main section of Denmark Street you changed -- have they recently added some? https://binged.it/2ti0Jl4

Well, it keeps the "history" so you can see what used to be in the building - plus it has address info which helps routing, etc. and will be useful when the next company move in.

Just in case, see Wikipedia:

"Bristol City Football Club is a professional football club in Bristol, England, who currently play in the Championship, the second tier of English football. Founded in 1894, they have played their home games at Ashton Gate since 1904"

This will be reverted - the usual name that's used is "Ashton Gate" - there's already an official name "Ashton Gate Stadium".

Ok - I'll undelete the building (but make sure it's not marked as a bank).

DId the building get demolished when the bank shut?

Not sure this is what you intended - the no left turn applies to all traffic including buses. In fact, there's no need for a no left turn -- the Westerleigh Lane highway is already marked as "motor_vehicle=no", "bus=yes".

How can you drive out of osm.org/way/666684146 if it's oneway?

Yes - there's a lot of recent changes and satellite and streetside are quite often out of date.

Thanks. What's the source for your edits? (I presume you haven't surveyed them all on foot).

This looks wrong - there's no way out of the new oneway section you've added - also no sign of a gate in Bing Streetside and it looks two way.

This looks wrong - Bing streetside only shows half of Orchard Road as oneway.

Some of the name and name:en look more like descriptions than names, e.g. osm.org/node/2950423588

Just seems a bad idea to remove data - old postcodes get used for a long time.

On the ground data (from receipts) should take precedence

Neither does the Henleaze one - I'll revert this in due course

W-o-T postcode no longer matches https://www.cats.org.uk/shop/find-a-shop

Why?

Please add descriptions using "description" -- if there's a signed name (ideally) or informal one, then adding that to the name is fine.