ndm's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
76115879 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks, but your link doesn't show a blue/white oneway sign. |
76311691 | almost 6 years ago | So good, they named it twice? |
76204147 | almost 6 years ago | As discussed with previous mapbox editor the road is not one-way there are no blue one-way signs. There is a no entry sign at one end only. Changes will be reverted later. |
76092773 | almost 6 years ago | You can't drive a normal bus on these sections (or in fact any other vehicle, or cycle, or ride - a horse) hence "access=no". You can use a "guided bus" - hence bus:guided=yes. If your system doesn't understand bus:guided, then you need to preprocess the data beforehand -- not change carefuilly surveyed on the ground OpenStreetMap data. |
76133401 | almost 6 years ago | You can't drive a normal bus on these sections (or in fact any other vehicle, or cycle, or ride - a horse) hence "access=no". You can use a "guided bus" - hence bus:guided=yes. If your system doesn't understand bus:guided, then you need to preprocess the data beforehand -- not change carefuilly surveyed on the ground OpenStreetMap data. |
76095163 | almost 6 years ago | You can't drive a normal bus on these sections (or in fact any other vehicle, or cycle, or ride - a horse) hence "access=no". You can use a "guided bus" - hence bus:guided=yes. If your system doesn't understand bus:guided, then you need to preprocess the data beforehand -- not change carefuilly surveyed on the ground OpenStreetMap data. |
76115879 | almost 6 years ago | The road doesn't have oneway signs it should not be marked oneway - I'll change it. |
76095163 | almost 6 years ago | Reverted - you can't drive an ordinary bus on the route. |
76092773 | almost 6 years ago | Reverted - you can't drive an ordinary bus on the route. |
76091639 | almost 6 years ago | Reverted - you can't drive an ordinary bus on the route. |
75875503 | almost 6 years ago | Looks like it's fenced off in Maxar Premium? |
75691207 | almost 6 years ago | Only a very rough idea. |
75660344 | almost 6 years ago | I distinctly remember the private road sign -- don't think there were any allowances for bikes / pedestrians. |
75494730 | almost 6 years ago | Changing the imagery layer to ESRI clarity might help you to get more detail / split into individual properties. You can see elsewhere in Bristol that mappers have tried to add individual addresses. |
75371432 | almost 6 years ago | ESRI clarity doesn't show the "to" road.
|
75376379 | almost 6 years ago | I've reverted this and added a one-way section, see 75389422 |
75376379 | almost 6 years ago | There is no turn restriction - "Old Bristol Road" seems to be one-way where it joins Durley Hill -- from road markings on Bing Streetside. |
75186018 | almost 6 years ago | I think dates should be treated with a grain of salt -- given that it should be already finished :-) https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/end-date-been-announced-temple-3367417 |
75186018 | almost 6 years ago | I've reverted your change, see 75196111. It now follows the other roads that are closed in the area being marked as construction. I've also added an OSM note, so that it's really obvious that it needs checking in the future. At the risk of sounding a bit grumpy -- I can't find your directed editing page -- like Amazon mappers have linked from their profiles. |
75186018 | almost 6 years ago | Have you added an entry in your diary to remove this later? The unconditional constraint doesn't get rendered. You haven't added any notes for local mappers - how are they to know to remove your changes. Weird - conditional is for last month? Surely better to mark it as construction - at least that's obvious. |