It's a building passage - coverd isn't a meaningful tag.

The footpath is over the shops on layer 1 -- why is it now marked as layer 0?

I was on foot and not taking notes of cycle infrastructure - be great if you could do a proper survey.

Does cross checking with other maps have any copyright implications?

Ok, reverted.

Have reverted - as it's 5 months old.

Please fix your edit Shaw Road looks like it has had nodes dragged.

Please fix your edit -- Downend Road A432 has been dragged.

See osm.org/node/17566444

I split disparate business units which will have unique addresses into different buildings -- this is akin to splitting terraced houses.

Most of the centre of Bristol is mapped this way. If you want to combine separate businesses together then I think you need some sort of relation / other container.

Mapping businesses as areas is really simple to explain to beginners -- it let's them be updated really easily. It provides a hierarchy based on size, that can be used by renderers. In contrast having several POIs in a building says nothing about their relative importance / area.

It's possible that something like the simple indoor mapping scheme might capture the best of both -- treating business units as "rooms" -- though unfortunately most renderers don't draw the outlines -- so more difficult to visualize and it's more dificult to explain to beginners.

It loses information, not a great approach - without area information renderers can’t determine which items are most important. I don’t think it really needs mapping - except on open historic map - if it’s that important maybe a relation? I was wondering about simple indoor mapping - but probably you’d need to add all entrances to each section. Or just add same wikidata tag to > 1 osm item which seems to be a heretical but practical approach.

Please add former buildings to open historic map -- openstreetmap is for current data.

It's already there as a bakery.

These sections cannot be driven by a normal bus -- it needs to be reverted.

This section cannot be driven by a normal bus -- it needs to be reverted.

I've reverted this change there are no one-way signs and junctions are 2-way at either end of Crokeswood Walk.

Surely, the name should be what's on the signage -- which is HSBC.

You can see it's not HSBC UK on Bing streetside.

Have they removed the metal marker?

osm.org/way/1037045325 ??

Could you please provide more information about this change set - what was the intention? Why are you adding residential ways to an airport?

Please add more details in your changeset comments -- what has been corrected?