OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
25088067 over 10 years ago

I didn't follow the whole way, but at least parts of these lines don't appear to meet the standard on the wiki for "abandoned"--they're more like razed (osm.wiki/Railways#Life-cycle) Can you please review and retag as appropriate?

26901381 over 10 years ago

I noticed that you "creatively" named some alleys in this changeset. OpenStreetMap is not a "sandbox" environment, so all changes affect the data for everyone. Please correct these edits, provide sources for the names, or your whole changeset may be reverted. Thanks

25375437 over 10 years ago

hi, it's unclear to me what you're adding with this (and a couple other similar nodes). is it a mile marker? if so, it should be tagged highway=milestone. if not, I'm not sure if it's good data to add to OSM from what I can tell: 1) it doesn't seem to be an observable feature, 2) it could be derived from the data, and 3) I don't know what a use case would be for it

19388570 over 10 years ago

Why did you change Aldens Corners to an isolated dwelling (wiki: "Smallest kind of human settlement. No more than 2 households.")? it clearly has more than two residences. Looks like you've done the same with other places tagged hamlet too.

27978721 over 10 years ago

From spot checking, it looks like you tagged many of these roads' maxspeed twice

28148682 over 10 years ago

Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See osm.org/way/322503620, osm.org/way/322114569, osm.org/way/322114772, osm.org/way/322503687

28384348 over 10 years ago

welcome to OSM! just a quick tip: don't include =* in the key tag. when something like highway=* is mentioned in the wiki where it's talking about key=value combinations, it means the key is highway and the value can be anything. if you look at the tags for the Edgewood Place way, you should get the idea. cheers!

28291612 over 10 years ago

Hi, I see you created a way (osm.org/way/323261135) for the 46 bus route (osm.org/relation/4502291). This is NOT how to do bus routes. You should add the existing road ways to the route relation, not create a new, overlapping way. See these examples of the 84 (osm.org/relation/3840819) or the 21 (osm.org/relation/3859430) routes. Also please see the wiki for instructions on how to do route relations: osm.wiki/Relation:route#How_to_map

28003628 over 10 years ago

Hi, noticed this change when it was flagged in OSM Inspector. You appear to have created a new relation for the Helena National Forest (osm.org/relation/4470349) and broken the old relation (osm.org/relation/4436658)? In addition, the way you added with this changeset includes only the source data attributes (no OSM tagging at all) which doesn't appear to conform to the import guidelines osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines. Please try to harmonize the data with OSM.

28159236 over 10 years ago

Hi Peter, not sure why you created a node just with your name on it. If it is the location of your office, you should tag it as such, for example see this page for ideas: osm.wiki/Key:office

28148682 over 10 years ago

Hi, I see some errors with this changeset in the Vicksburg, Mississippi area. You duplicated data and misused basic tags. For example, see osm.org/way/322114814 and the nearby Culkin Road bridge. Please correct ASAP.

27963476 over 10 years ago

hey just wondering why you're adding nodes only tagged with josm/ignore on them? if it's notes for yourself, maybe there are better ways to do it?

27947206 over 10 years ago

fyi, I removed the hospital tag from the ARC building--it is not a hospital

21200329 over 10 years ago

these parking areas don't make a lot of sense. try tracing them more accurately as they actually are, including tracing around buildings. tagging capacity is a nice touch, though!

27901421 over 10 years ago

Hi, it looks like you did a large import of data and haven't included OSM tags, just the attributes that were with the data. It also seems likely this didn't go through the Mechanical Edit Process outlined here: osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy I look forward to your reply. If I don't hear from you, I will probably send this on to the Data Working Group for review.

27450332 over 10 years ago

Are these forward/backward nodes supposed to be in a relation or something? It's not really clear why they're there

27423715 over 10 years ago

Hi Andrew, just an fyi that there were some typos in your recent Fargo changesets--see taginfo (http://tinyurl.com/ndper3t)

26461280 over 10 years ago

Hi, just wondering what your thinking was changing the tagging for the houses and other buildings from building=yes to landuse=*? fyi, I changed the ones I noticed back to buildings.

26416677 over 10 years ago

typos (nzme instead of name) in Ohare west bypass ramps

26512204 over 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM! I noticed that some of the nodes you created are already mapped as ways (ie - tags are on the buildings). OSM policy is to not map the same feature twice, and to trend towards more detail, so I removed a couple. Most map renderers are able to create a label based on the way as necessary. Cheers!