nickjohnston's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
161283330 | 5 days ago | Sorry, this isn't local to me. I just updated the road name, writing "Road" in full. |
148110391 | over 1 year ago | This changeset was created in error. The Yard was added in changeset 148110378. |
147700308 | over 1 year ago | My comment should have used Windsor *Street*, not Road. |
138685246 | over 1 year ago | Hi, In this changeset you added an entrance for number 49: You appear to have inadvertently tagged it with an addr:street of Albion Street instead of Clarence Street. Could you fix it, please? Thanks,
|
142210226 | over 1 year ago | Hi, In this changeset you've added a garden which the High Street goes through (osm.org/way/1213459717). The feature on the ground is more like a glorified flowerbed, and in any case, the road does not go through it. Could you please move the "garden" and the trees slightly so they're not intersected by the road, and perhaps re-tag the area as man_made=planter or similar? Thanks,
|
142209276 | over 1 year ago | Hi. You've added two entrance nodes (osm.org/node/11242350932 and osm.org/node/11242365756). They duplicate their buildings' addresses which is neither desirable nor necessary. You've also used addr:block, which is not common in the UK. If the entrances are for specific flats, add addr:flats. Please do not duplicate the address information (such as addr:housenumber and addr:street). Thanks,
|
103221945 | almost 2 years ago | Thanks for the comment. I made heavy use of associatedStreet relations when adding addresses in Cheltenham, as at the time that was what people on the #osm-gb IRC channel recommended. (Capturing the information was the most important thing; later it could be represented differently if desired.) Now I use addr:parentstreet as you suggest as it's simpler. |
137208037 | about 2 years ago | I pasted the inscription instead my intended comment, which was: Add inscription on Thomas M. Kettle monument in St Stephen's Green. |
121978788 | over 2 years ago | The original changeset comment should have referred to Suffolk Coffee, not Soho Coffee. |
124061589 | about 3 years ago | Re-used a previous changeset comment by mistake. The comment for this change should have been: Removed incorrect addr:street usage on two ways. |
123327447 | about 3 years ago | Hi, I went there today and collected some missing addresses, which I've now added. Construction has mostly finished. (There are only two houses being built now.) I also fixed one of your FIXMEs. (20 Fairford Road wasn't in the correct place.) Several houses on Withington Close (which I added the name for) are now occupied. The others are mostly sold and awaiting occupation. Can you please copy the UPRN from the node you created near Fossebridge Place to the appropriate way? (The other node is for a building which is still under construction I think.) Thanks,
|
123327447 | about 3 years ago | Hi, I'm actually planning on going to the area tomorrow to collect a few missing house numbers, and to see how the construction is progressing near Fossebridge Place. Based on imagery it looks like some of the houses may well be finished by now. Feel free to add the building outlines. I will try to get addresses for them ☺ Nick |
119880046 | about 3 years ago | Hi Karl, Thanks for the explanation. Ordnance Survey and OpenStreetMap naturally have their own different conventions and styles. With OpenStreetMap being a global project, it tries to adopt schemes that work globally (sometimes with a few local changes). For the sake of consistency as well as routing, I think it makes sense to follow the established conventions. I understand your desire for more road classifications, but highway=service on these roads isn't the answer. I'm planning on reverting your change to restore consistency to the roads in town. I'm happy to discuss particular roads if you like. Thanks,
|
119880046 | about 3 years ago | Hi Karl, Thanks for your reply. I'm curious: what motivated you to change these roads/streets in the first place? These streets in the town centre have been largely untouched for 13 years or so. When changing data in OpenStreetMap, especially as a relatively new mapper, it's worth considering why things are tagged as they are, and whether you have new information that others might have overlooked. Thanks,
|
119880046 | about 3 years ago | Hi, I'm a bit confused about why you've tagged several sections of road as service roads. Can you please explain why you've tagged Winchcombe Street, part of the High Street, Rodney Road, and Regent Street as service roads? I'm happy to provide to help if necessary. Thanks,
|