I entered a changeset comment for this change, but JOSM didn't upload it. I encountered this bug before. It's rare and I can't reproduce it. Somehow JOSM gets into a state where the comment and source boxes are empty, but JOSM thinks a comment has been entered (as the warning for an empty or short comment is not shown). Any comment entered is disregarded.

The comment for this changeset should have been:

"Improve alignment and geometry of buildings and roads in Charlton Kings and Leckhampton".

Hi,

Sorry for the slow reply.

I'd say 67257 is redundant now. I don't think there is any need to move ways from it into 269708, as 269708 already has the ways in it.

Thanks,
Nick

Somehow, JOSM didn't use the changeset comment that I entered, so here it is: "Added some missing house numbers and names in Lansdown, Cheltenham. Also improved road alignment."

You're right, it should not be tagged as a building. The perimeter is mostly a metal fence, with an outer hedge in places (mostly along Saint Johns Avenue).

Thanks for pointing this out. I added it by mistake. I've fixed it now.

Hi,

I meant not tagged with the name, as I'm not sure the path is known by that name. It's a bit more nuanced though if the path is named on Cleeve Common's schematic, but that's arguably more for illustrative purposes rather than being a definitive source of the name.

Thanks,
NIck

Hi :)

Is osm.org/way/105591747 really called "Main Path"?

Thanks,
Nick

Hi,

It looks like the node you added for St Paul's (osm.org/node/7619436096) might be a duplicate of osm.org/node/5629209348.

I'm not sure which node is in the most appropriate location, but I don't think we need two for St Paul's.

Could you take a look, please? :)

Great work--BIshop's Cleeve was a little sparse building-wise, and it looks like you've added all of them now :)

Thanks for these changes. I'm pleased to see Tamil names being added, but I think you need to use name:ta instead of name:tam. Taginfo shows under 50 uses of name:tam globally.

Added not:name and source:not:name. Thanks.

Is alt_name the best tag for this? The street has not actually been known by that name (except by error on some maps). Would not:name be more appropriate here?

Hi. Unfortunately I don't understand what the designation is of Wymans Brook east of Pittville Lake. In this change I just fixed the direction, and (apparently) clarified that the brook is not part of River Chelt. Good luck for finding out :)

Hi :) By coincidence, I visited Southfield Manor Park last week. "Southfild Manor" (way 627640005) is signed as "Southfield Manor" outside it, so I'd use that as the name, and "Southfild Manor" as alt_name or old_name. Thanks.

Hi. Thanks for helping to improve the map in Singapore, particularly in Bukit Timah Nature Reserve. In future, please don't use generic names like "stream" or "footpath" for features; instead, please tag the features appropriately :) Thanks

Hi,

Sorry, my mistake--I should have realised that you just split the way. Looks like ref=Exit was originally added on the way several years ago. I will remove it.

Thanks :)

Hi. Thanks for helping improve the map in Singapore.

Your change adds a new way (654572674) which has ref=Exit. This isn't correct use of the ref tag--for roads or highways, ref should be the reference (a number or abbreviation, typically), such as KPE for Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway.

I'm pleased that you want to map exits and junctions, but ref=Exit isn't the correct way to do that. Please see the "Exit Info" page on the wiki.

Also, way 654572674 (and the other sections of the same "logical way", such as the link road from Tampines Expressway) shouldn't have name=KPE, since it's not part of KPE proper.

Thanks :)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for taking the time to improve the map.

The commercial area you added would probably be clearer as a pedestrian area. Also, I wouldn't call it "promenade", because it's only part of the Promenade. For future reference, please use an initial uppercase letter for names (Promenade, not promenade), unless there's a good reason not to. It helps keep the map looking smart.

BTW, you can add points or nodes or trees (within the area). Sometimes it can be hard to get an accurate count of trees from aerial imagery, so you could count the number of trees on the ground, and then add the position of the trees from imagery.

Hi. In this changeset, you've changed the name of a small building (osm.org/way/476263573) to "terminal B". Since it's nowhere near the actual terminal B, this seems like a mistake. You've also renamed several roads to "terminal B". Some of these were previously called "Terminal C - Arrivals" and similar, which seems more correct. Could you please take a look and fix? Thanks :)

Thanks for clarifying :)