My photo is tagged at 45.565940, -122.215915, but it's so dark, all you can see is that there's a guard rail. The more I think, though, I think that those are bad coordinates. And it may be moot - there's a news article about them needing to move the camera because they don't have permits for the initial location in WSDOT right-of-way ( https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/technology/wsdot-orders-flock-safety-cameras-removed/283-061bbad5-64b0-4990-bbd4-1faaee467e13 ). For what it's worth, the article identifies the old location as MP 22.90, which would be on the other side of marble road, just west of where you tagged it. That location matches my memory better than the location I initially put it at. I've deleted my node and moved your node to what I think is the original location based on the above, with a fixme note.

osm.org/changeset/162215555

But if you have a local contact, they're supposedly moving it soon/have recently moved it somewhere to the east of the original location. I'm also no longer in the area and don't have local contacts I'd trust to be able to safely and accurately report on this.

Hey there. I noticed that between the two of us, we seem to have added the same camera twice. I added it a bit east of where you have it, but all I had was memory and a very blurry photo that may have been geotagged poorly. Do you have anything better to confirm the correct location? If you do, feel free to delete the one I added.

osm.org/node/12464269099

Thanks for adding features to the map. However, please be careful not to rely on aerial imagery instead of what's on the ground. In this case, you reverted the new boat launch that was already open to the old configuration. I've just fixed it back to the way it should be.

Sorry about that. I guess I was focused on closing the gap and didn't go back to verify I hadn't added too much. Should be fixed now.

Hey, thanks for the good work adding the relations for the Towns. Just a note--when there's a Village/City entirely contained within the town, like the village of Nelson here, the Village needs to be role "inner" in the Town relation. That makes it like the inside of a donut, so that the Village is not considered part of the Town. It's an easy thing to overlook, but there's a subtle difference.

Thanks for your work getting the relations entered!

Hi there. I see you're enthusiastic about abandoned railways, but please be careful not to delete other tags. The abandoned railway in Hudson ( osm.org/way/307094880 ) is now a path, and when you deleted the highway=path tag, the path got removed from the map. In OSM, the map should reflect current conditions, so it needs to stay as a path, even if you'd prefer it to display as an abandoned railroad.

Thanks for the response.

I'd initially based it on the eastbound sign above, and the westbound sign ( https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/QJxJPI5a8vGa_vaNUmSR6g ), as well as this note: ( osm.org/note/1111260 ). Though looking around, other than the signs, the data I've found so far indicates that the split _IS_ the state line. I can't tell if the issue is that the data sources don't have a way to indicate that MNDOT owns something outside the state, or that the transition is truly the state line. (I've seen one source that willfully mis-draws the MN/WI state line around the bit of MN23 that's in WI to make it appear to be fully in MN, so there's definitely some limitations in the online data I've found so far. I'm going to leave this as-is while I dig a bit more.

If I do end up moving it, I'll take your advice and put notes on the nodes at the split (and maybe the state line too) citing whatever sources I can find.

Just noticed that you moved the WI64/MN36 split to the state line. Do you know that this is correct? On the road, the signage for the split is installed well into Wisconsin:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/e3SZ2GaI1Y0j2_4qXhlAUQ

OK, so that wasn't exactly what I'd intended to do. Still working out how to use Vespucci. Thanks for the heads up, changeset #40170321 fixes this to what I was trying to tag.