Hi, I think this supermarcet should use brand:wikidata instead of operator:wikidata. Please let me know if it is also operated by aldi. Thanks!

Dobrogo vremeni, a chto s node 3584458664 ? Stranny kakoito - ego udalit'?

hi, is the subway cafe is just a brand, or is it actually operated by the Subway corp? Usually it is better to use brand:wikidata/brand:wikipedia

Hi, do you knowif starbucks here is just the brand, or is actually operated by starbucks? Usually it is better to mark things as brand:wikipedia/brand:wikidata. Thanks!

Hi, here's the map of all objects, whose subject:wikidata points to a sculptor, or a subclass of a sculptor:
http://tinyurl.com/y84mu9nf (there are 9 of them). You do raise a good point that it might be the artist and not the subject. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!

Hi, please don't add wikipedia/wikidata tags to stores like this - they are already tagged with "brand:wikipedia" and "brand:wikidata". Use wikipedia only for 1:1 descriptions. Thanks!

* The discussion was quiet for 4 days
* Every raised point was addressed, as was mentioned in the talk. Several people meticulously answered all of the objections. One objection was un-answerable because it basically claimed something without backing it up. Regardless, I worked very attentively with every dessenter.
* Wiki has many pages about this effort
* Agree about not having Automated edits/username - I don't recall this was brought up before, but a valid point, will add.
* My account is tied to my main email, and I usually reply within the same day to every message, either on changeset or direct.
* There was no bot - all was done with josm, using well tested built-in tools
* Exactly the same change was being done as before, with the method described repeatably on various forms of media
* The change was not in 6 digits

So from your list, it appears that while I followed the spirit and the scope of the mechanical edit policy (discussed on a global channel until it went quiet, IRC, created a huge system to fix uncovered issues, was always available, etc), I did not create a wiki page Automated edits/username. Instead of asking me to create it (which I would have gladly done right away), I was constantly harased by you with all sorts of "this edit is too quickly following another edit" or "don't do mech edits" type of complaints, mostly for manual editing. This is not constructive. It felt as a targeted, biased harassment rather than simply asking for additional steps that needed to be performed.

Dobrogo vremeni. Davaite peredvinem "wikipedia" & "wikidata" tags v "subject:wikipedia & "subject:wikidata". Spasibo!

More information:
osm.wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks

Hi, could you add Wikidata IDs too please - using wikipedia plugin in JOSM, data menu, fetch IDs. Thanks!
See -
osm.wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks

P.S. this is part of osm.wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks

Hi, do you mind also adding Wikidata IDs? In JOSM, using wikipedia plugin, simply click "Fetch IDs" in the data menu. Thx!

hi, if ok, please add wikidata IDs when adding Wikipedia tags. In JOSM, use "wikipedia plugin" -- data menu, "fetch IDs". Thanks!

Hi, you removed wikidata tag from node 2179195588, is there an error with it?

Hi, I am still looking into how we can work around the block. Its a pain for sure :(
In the mean time, could you take a look at osm.wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project -- I would love some help with them :)
I will add wikidata to your edits in the mean time.

Which portion of it did I fail to address? Global note, discussion, proceeded. Not a mixed response - every concern was answered on the email channel (except for one email that was not raising any reasonable objection as I later noted), and did not receive any further comment until restarted. If you feel this is not so, feel free to start a dispute.

Yes they were. They were clearly marked as mechanical (with the word auto). And they followed the rules.

The group was checked, individually. Afterwards, they were uploaded one by one because they appeared in different places of the world.

Yes. In a group of 10 nodes. Each of which were checked by hand. I know the rules, and despite your accusations, I haven't broken any of them. I specifically studied the mechanical edits policy.

Should 26421469 node have a wikipedia tag? If not, both should be deleted, but it appeared legit enough to stay.

SomeoneElse, this is becoming a harassing behavior. Where do you see a mechanical edit? This was a single node manual edit.