OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
89772922 almost 5 years ago

Hi there, I've changed the traffic island areas from area=highway back to area=yes.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

89774346 almost 5 years ago

Hi there, you've moved the Petersham Reservoir across the street, and a helipad north of the harbour across to a sidewalk. Was this by accident?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

89779719 almost 5 years ago

Hi there, you've moved a windsock in Sydney and changed one of the seamarks in Sydney Harbour. Since there's no source on the changeset, what is the source for this change?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

89774948 almost 5 years ago

Hi there, you added a helipad that already existed at North Head. I've gone ahead and removed the duplicate.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

89599320 almost 5 years ago

As it was mapped before, it doesn't connect to Dickson Lane, in fact it doesn't connect to Victoria Road (although in the latter case it probably should)

89717919 almost 5 years ago

G'day afa5e, and welcome to OSM,

Generally we prefer to preserve object history, which can be achieved by modifying the outline of existing objects instead of deleting old ones and then redrawing i.e. courtyards unless it's necessary. That way a better picture of the timeline of objects and the project can be achieved.

Thanks for you contributions,
ortho_is_hot

89746377 almost 5 years ago

Correction, bridge=yes should read tunnel=yes

89450963 almost 5 years ago

osm.org/changeset/89745583 Changed to stop_position, overlooked that one

89450963 almost 5 years ago

I've added back the original stop_position nodes (removing the tag additions) in changeset 89742518 to preserve the history.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

89603889 almost 5 years ago

Also interesting to note that the roads in question also appear on the NSW government's base map and topographic maps which are also public information

89603889 almost 5 years ago

I've reverted this (changeset 89686302) because of the above as well as the fact that even if they are private and even if they are no longer recognisable as roads, they could still be tagged as paths or other features; and they already have access=private.

89599320 almost 5 years ago

https://openstreetcam.org/details/1567561/425/track-info

89599320 almost 5 years ago

Hi, based on the changeset comment and tagging it's been marked as a customer only path which on LPI Imagery and OpenStreetCam appears to exist?

88198054 almost 5 years ago

Based on both the bounding box (osm.org/changeset/88126138) and the visualisation [and relation modifications] (https://osmcha.org/changesets/88126138/) of this changeset from tfnsw, as well as the ways that you added to the relation (https://osmcha.org/changesets/89550405), I would say with fair certainty that I am not responsible for said destruction. As for changes going through the intersection, they closed the multipolygon in the area so they're not an issue.

89559820 almost 5 years ago

Changesets reverted: 89547291, 89547219, 89547119, 89547009, 89546947, 89546740, 89546619, 89546467, 89546339, 89546258, 89546223, 89545787, 89545736, 89545697, 89545624, 89545559, 89544453, 89544366, 89544335, 89544289, 89544238, 89544200, 89543385, 89543326, 89543264, 89543162, 89543120, 89543105, 89543001, 89542981, 89542939, 89542902, 89542849, 89542811, 89542415, 89542362, 89542310, 89541717, 89541668, 89541613, 89541567, 89541515, 89541486, 89541397, 89541359, 89541316, 89541240, 89541182, 89541150, 89541122, 89541106, 89541091, 89541072, 89539828, 89539594, 89539499, 89539353, 89495429, 89495220, 89495068, 89494928, 89494711, 89494517, 89494402, 89494225, 89494055, 89493920, 89493720, 89493519, 89493307, 89493112, 89493038, 89492867, 89492709, 89492453, 89488892, 89488839, 89488809, 89488729, 89488618, 89488551, 89488480, 89488412, 89488185, 89488076, 89488053, 89487982, 89487944, 89487883, 89487339, 89487298, 89487189, 89487150, 89487094, 89487052, 89487011, 89486934, 89486862, 89486801, 89486271, 89486180, 89486146, 89486113, 89486050, 89486000, 89485949, 89485874, 89485846, 89485811, 89485461, 89485423, 89485369, 89485307, 89485280, 89485220, 89485192, 89485155, 89485121, 89381972, 89381918, 89381860, 89381782, 89381644, 89381567, 89381542, 89381447, 89381423, 89381397, 89381325, 89381289, 89381226, 89381172, 89381155, 89381128, 89381061, 89381022, 89380999, 89380968, 89380935, 89380890, 89380864, 89380823, 89380799, 89380767, 89380713, 89380677, 89380633, 89380544, 89380416, 89380391, 89380354, 89380304, 89380270, 89380220, 89380186, 89380136, 89380108, 89380061, 89379998, 89379964, 89379935, 89379893, 89379232, 89379191, 89379120, 89379101, 89379078, 89379035, 89379005, 89378998, 89378932, 89378909, 89378862, 89378812, 89378771, 89378762, 89378752, 89378731, 89378716, 89378689, 89378672, 89378662, 89378646, 89378627, 89378612, 89378586, 89378568, 89378551, 89378495, 89378447, 89378415, 89378378, 89378148, 89378034, 89377843, 89377717, 89377552, 89334264, 89334114, 89334040, 89333541, 89333399, 89333191, 89332952, 89332779, 89332593, 89332383, 89332211, 89331645, 89331497, 89331383, 89331183, 89331018, 89330890, 89330750, 89330647, 89330527, 89330425, 89330164, 89330052, 89329831, 89329723, 89327663, 89327571, 89327478, 89327424, 89326714, 89326632, 89326520, 89326463, 89326351, 89326299, 89325567, 89325519, 89324891, 89324804, 89324740, 89324678, 89324627, 89324477, 89274334, 89274054, 89273873, 89273768, 89273686, 89272972, 89272946, 89272882, 89272861, 89272841, 89272800, 89272752, 89272705, 89272674, 89272644, 89272530, 89272475, 89272404, 89272351, 89272300, 89221513, 89221438, 89221383

89544799 almost 5 years ago

Hi, I've reverted the changes in Caddens as:
1. a survey 10 days ago revealed the roads are still closed
2. you deleted the existing ways instead of updating the tags and preserving the history
3. there was no source listed so this appears to be an armchair edit

If this is incorrect then I'm open to discussion.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

89542849 almost 5 years ago

For the fourth time, please specify a source for your information. The 100km/hr limit here is completely incorrect, in fact the contrary is indicated on other odbl compliant sources.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

89542811 almost 5 years ago

Hi, for the third time, what is the source of the speed limit information. This section was surveyed on 2020-07 and was 60km/hr, which is also visible on LPI NSW Imagery. Please refrain from adding incorrect information without a source to OpenStreetMap.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

89541240 almost 5 years ago

Hi, once again what is the source that you are obtaining speed limits from? This location indicated both 60km/hr (not 50) on LPI Imagery, OpenStreetCam, and Mapillary. It would be helpful for other mappers to have a source tag on the changeset.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

89514785 almost 5 years ago

Just checking, has the ANZAC monument been re/moved?