survey:date should read 2025-01-03

Thanks, you are correct, will update the node

This changeset has been reverted in osm.org/changeset/133573048

Gah you're fast! Nice edit!

Hi, Campbell Parade going past the park is concrete in this section, not asphalt?

Hi there, Brighton Boulevard does not allow cyclists to travel against the flow of traffic as there are no entry signs. Has something been changed recently?

Agree with Diacritic here, source is incompatible and descriptive names that are not reflected in the real world do not belong in OSM. If you keeping adding this stuff back then getting the Data Working Group involved will be necessary.

Hi, is there a reason that you've mapped ways that aren't physically separated instead of just adding implicit turn restrictions to the intersection?

Hi, is there a reason that you're splitting ways where there isn't any physical division e.g. access from Renwick Street into parking facilities? Cheers, ortho_is_hot

Hi SavageRainbow,

It seems like you've drawn several roads on top of each other, e.g. drawing a duplicate roundabout at the intersection for West Street and Amherst Street. Do you need help to remove or update some of the data?

Feel free to reach out.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi Stephen, am wondering whether you know if the Cornwallis Road closure is completed (its been 7 months since the changeset?) Cheers

Beat me to it! Nice edit

Hey Skribe,

Marked cycle lanes on roadways shouldn't be mapped as separate ways unless they are physically separated (e.g. concrete separators) rather than a painted line or buffer (this is a general principle in OSM for highway mapping).

You can specify that Eccles Boulevard has a cycle lane by adding:

cycleway:left=lane

to the roadway.

If you have any other questions then do reach out.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Congratulations!

Scottie is correct, evidently slice0 broke the relation in version 2 of the relation, possibly inadvertently (without iD telling you) therefore the relation was doing nothing

Ah fantastic, I remember having read that in the council minutes but didn't check up to see if that actually happened. There was some talk about those sorts of texture bands, if they exist at the entrances to side streets for instance (see Hall Street / Glenayr Avenue intersection in Bondi), then they can be mapped as traffic_calming=threshold as threshold seems to be the term used in Australia

Hiya, just commenting because you requested a review; this is all correct provided the roads are after a 40 area sign, and don't have an end 40 area sign. (unrelated to OSM, is this the new 40 zone they talked about or is it an existing one?).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, the street address has been fixed; it was not edited by this user.

Hi aaronsta,

Thanks for confirming that this is the case; since I'm not from WA I have no practical way of determining this. If the routes are properly dead in the water then I would suggest bringing this up in the mailing list as I think that such a large change should be discussed with other mappers (a few WA members & bike riders have left their thoughts).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot (Luke)

Hi,

In regards to the routes:

"largely they are fragmented, and consist of riding on roads without any dedicated infrastructure" - this is representative of routes across Australia; many routes in Sydney are like this and area just sharrows, however as they are still signposted they are mapped as routes.

"the signage has not been maintained, and maintenance is the responsibility of the respective local government authority ... signage has been maintained ad-hoc" - this may be the case however councils likely maintain a list/map of routes (at least thats how it works in NSW). Signage is also not always maintained properly in my experience.

"if you live in Perth, I seriously doubt you would have ever used these routes for navigation, nor would you have ever purposefully ridden by the route, instead of taking a more direct or safer route option as to on road cycling." - they are still routes nonetheless, often times I find myself following or deviating from a route at will however that does not change the fact that they are routes and infrastructure is generally designed to cater for these routes.

"The routes are circuitous" - see above

"The OSM information has not been maintained to reflect changes, and the OSM application of the routes were not consistent" - in this case then routes should be reviewed and updated where necessary, but I do not think that outright deletion is warranted

These map edits and wiki changes have attracted some attention on the mailing list; it would be appreciated if you engage with that list as well (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015748.html)

Thanks,
otho_is_hot (Luke)