G'day, I've reverted this change (osm.org/changeset/94707615) since both roads are already separated as there were no shared nodes (aka no possible routing) and the bridge was already marked with layer=1. Is there a particular router that this is causing issues with?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

G'day 2Woy, and welcome to OSM,

Just with osm.org/way/876104295 highway=pedestrian is suited to wide areas open for pedestrians e.g. squares, plazas, which are closed to vehicles (see osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian). In my opinion a small cut-through like that would be more suited to a general footway (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway). Apart from the changeset looks good.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

That could be the case; I'll review my dashcam later today and make adjustments to the motorway as necessary

In my opinion, yes they should both be reverted given its a major motorway, as well as in my opinion these aren't correct

Thanks! I plan to add more detail like this unless there are any objections ;)

From what I can tell, the change has made it so that the offramp connects closer to the tunnel entry instead of continuing on to only exit at the offramp, which is the opposite of the case in real life, the single lane is only meant to exit on KGR.

Sorry my mistake, I was a block off. I'll revert my changes, thanks for pointing that one out

Surveyed on 2020-11-10, the road is now connected (the roundabout has become a signalised intersection) so I've gone ahead and updated it osm.org/changeset/94093451

My best guess is that there is some form of ongoing construction or they need some sort of approval before they remove the signage. Given that there is signage I would think that its still a no go for a while

Hi, has this road opened yet?

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

Whoops, thanks for fixing that

Thanks for the correction, looks good

This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts

This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts

This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts

Hi there, I would suggest using the DCS Imagery (should be at the top of the background list on the right) as it is higher quality compared to Bing. Also, to ensure that building outlines have 90 degree angles, you can use the orthagonalize tool, which is accessed with the "Q" key in iD

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

No worries, thanks for clarifying

Hi, the onramp curve looks good however my own as well as the existing GPS data agrees more with the motorway being closer to where it was before?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, is osm.org/way/714727382/history not a driveway or access road for the car dealership?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, osm.org/way/865779413 has the building=yes tag but from what I can see it's only the grass outline?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot