G'day,
I have reverted some of your contributions to Aesthete Hair Salon in a new changeset (osm.org/changeset/75186250). If you have any questions of contentions please reach out.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

G'day,
I have reverted some of your contributions to Lamrock Cafe in a new changeset (osm.org/changeset/75186250). If you have any questions of contentions please reach out.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

G'day,

Just commenting because you have requested a review of the changeset.

The changes to osm.org/way/548493210 are correct, as it is not a sidewalk. If you want, you can add surface=grass or whatever is relevant to the way which is more precise than surface=unpaved.

As for osm.org/way/728238089 it would be helpful to add the type of path, whether that be for vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, etc. The two other paths between streets appear to be correct.

The path along Croudace Bay Road also appears to be correct.

Thanks for your contribution—if you need any help with editing feel free to ask.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

G'day,

Just commenting because you requested a review on this changeset.

I have looked at the changes that you have made. The driveways are correct and so is the pier. With the pier, the way can be split where it becomes a concrete path, tagged as highway=footway or "Foot Path" in the iD editor.

Thanks for your contribution.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

G'day,

Regarding your edits to "Lamrock Cafe", the "phone" tag is used in the international format, which includes a "61+" preface to Australian numbers in this case. As for the "review" and "stars" tags, these are not recognised in OpenStreetMap except for ratings from tourism or other recognised state agencies rather than individuals. Finally, as there is no changeset comment about the source of the opening hours, can you confirm that these were independently verified rather than copied from google as the order of days would suggest (additionally the opening hours syntax is incorrect for OpenStreetMap as I have already linked on other edits).

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

G'day

Regarding your edits to "Aesthete Hair Salon", the "description" tag is reserved for objective comments about features of the facility, rather than recommendations. Information such as the services offered is an example of correct entries. The "menu" tag is not a recognised tag on OpenStreetMap, and would relate to services from food outlets. This information should be moved to the "description" tag. As I outlined in my comment on "The Bucket List", the opening hours syntax is not correct, and the order of the days suggest it has been copied from google. Finally, the "stars" tag is for objective ratings provided from official agencies rather than individuals or Google.

If you have further questions or need help editing, feel free to ask.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

Additionally, the day order of opening hours suggests that it was copied from google rather than independently sourced

G'day and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Regarding your edits to "The Bucket List", there is no recognised "entertainment" tag, which whilst you are allowed to do it, I would suggest moving it to a description tag instead as it relates to the restaurant. As for the opening hours, OpenStreetMap uses it's own syntax for opening hours, which can be found on the wiki osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours -- I have fixed the hours on this restaurant already. As for the "stars" tag, this tag is reserved for state tourism board or similar operators, rather than sources such as Google which has a listing of 4 stars for this restaurant. As the changeset source lists local knowledge, can you confirm that these opening hours were sourced independently rather than from a source such as google?

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

Hi there, is there any reason you are creating a new changeset for each new building or feature you are adding? You've created more than 1000 just today

Thank you for pointing out that error; I have removed the duplicate segments and changed some roles on lines to achieve the desired result in changeset #74331988 (as far as I can tell)

I had presumed that because it was a slip lane it would be considered part of the road, but yeah taginfo has only 11% name=* usage on tertiary_link. Thanks for pointing that out

Thanks for pointing that out. I have merged nodes into node #6026534240 and have checked the relation roles

Thanks for pointing out the errors. I've moved the bollards to the way and added count=* and fixed the building tagging. As for way #520768412, I've split it at the point where it turns into an aisle; the service=* tagging was suggested in osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle and osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway that says access ways to the parking lot should be tagged service=*

Nah all good, I was idling on this one for a few hours. Just moved a road which I fixed in a changeset, nothing big :)

I believe I have fixed it in changeset #73087791

G'day yep you're right, it's left/right. I'll fix that now. Cheers!

Yep you're 100% right; created a changeset to revert that

Zoom level 12 tile shows that the red outline and strikes are back surrounding the airport so I presume that relation is completely joined?

Hi again,
I've made adjustments in changeset #69274926 ; are there any other relations that require modification?
Thanks

Hi there,
Thanks for pointing out those issues. I will attempt to fix them shortly.