Also the roads here osm.org/way/757861362 are probably better off as service or unclassified imo

Apologies for the worldwide changeset - I mistakenly edited a similar sounding location on the other side of the world (have corrected this)

Ah nice catch, thank you, I will re-do the relation so it fits better

This changeset has been reverted in osm.org/changeset/113567200

That's interesting, wonder why that's the case; in any case thanks for updating the tags

Hi, just wondering if there is a specific router which these ways were not working with without the bicycle tagging? Just thinking that bicycle=dismount would be more appropriate as =yes implies that you are allowed to ride (which with pedestrian signals only you aren't)

No worries, generally the tagging schemes are universal... I'm (was) working on a one-stop wiki page for cycle and related stuff, might have to work on it again

Hi there,

On-road cycle lanes that aren't physically separated (osm.org/way/993850583) shouldn't be mapped as separate ways but can be specified on the roadway with cycleway:lane=* and any ramps from the shared path/pavement can be connected directly to the road.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, just commenting because you ticked review, good change for this road.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

A note that Google Street View can't be used for OpenStreetMap edits

Hi, I've restored the deleted roads in osm.org/changeset/112145366

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, just commenting because you've left a request -

Changeset is all fine however adding suburb names (at least in Australia) is a bit unnecessary as the suburb boundaries exist as relations, so the suburb, postcode, state, and country can be derived from the boundaries e.g. here is the relation for Woollahra: osm.org/relation/5718966 . Although as I said there's nothing incorrect about it so all good

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

No worries with the requests, submit as many as you need. Perhaps I should've looked closer and seen that they're down the centre, in which case they're fine to leave on the roadway as they are.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi there just_another_mapper,

When mapping trees, the nodes should be at the base of the tree, rather than on the roadway. This can be a bit difficult with the particularly large trees we have in the east, however either on-the-ground knowledge or an educated guess should be enough to position each tree.

In regards to some of the other changesets you've requested a review on, the appear to be all good from what I can tell. If you have any questions then do reach out.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi there,

It seems that there is now a duplicate overlapping Howe Field Road between the intersection of Scarer's Lane and the bridge over the waterway. Would you be able to fix this up?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Your edits have been reverted osm.org/changeset/108832780

Hi, your edits have been deleted. If you need to use OSM for test data then sandboxes exist for this purpose.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

Hi there,

Dalton Street and Sedgman Avenue are no longer connected to Bowral Road, the nodes are just overlapping. I don't want to break the turn restrictions and such by editing it myself, would you be able to reconnect them?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

No worries, happy mapping!

Hi, here's a query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/193B (that should auto-run) that shows all the cartpaths that you have last edited that have a name (all of them won't be erroneous however some will be). Would suggest though that if the ways represent real features e.g. hedges, etc, or whatever you've drawn them along then they should be retagged rather than deleted.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot