Hi, this changeset did not correct the payment notation.

It removed a valid addr:country tag, an invalid "categoery" tag, a verbose description, an unnecessary image, a valid
payment:debit_cards tag, and fixed an invalid addr:street tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125723784

Good catch, fixed

Thanks for contributing to OSM! I've edited your business entry to have more standardized tag usage and sound less spammy. It's very common for businesses to add themselves to the map with as much information as possible, but we like to keep it short and sweet: even the Grand Canyon doesn't have a description or image tag!

Thanks again and if you would like to contribute more, one good way can be to make sure that people can get good driving directions to your location. As you know, GPS apps often tell people to drive very creatively in rural areas and nobody knows your area better than you! Popular OSM GPS apps are Organic Maps and OsmAnd, but you can check driving directions on openstreetmap.com as well.

Cheers and thanks again!

Please avoid making changes that span cities or states, it makes the change really hard to view and notifies hundreds of people.

Apologies, you'd think the iD preset would've caught that.

Hi there! FYI I'm removing names like "golf cart path" in this area because golf_cart=yes should be enough for anyone interested, and because there is no signage saying every one of these paths has a name of "Golf Cart Path" for the same reason that every sidewalk isn't named "Sidewalk."

Hi Tkbonesdir! I'm looking at helping map this area, and I'm wondering about way #665523513, the newly built section to the south. It's a residential area labeled as "The Villages, Florida" however the city of "The Villages" (relation #1240329) seems to be a much larger border that cuts halfway through this area. Do you know if the boundaries or names for these areas has changed?

Looking good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125392961

Yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125397286

This building is very skewed, please use imagery with the correct projection, or use the Square function to ensure accuracy.

Hi, are you just deleting buildings and re-adding them for an OSM streak?

Hey there, a handful of these "buildings" are in the lake and might be piers, might be worth double checking.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124821415

Actually I noticed you've got a full remodeling parent company next door so it makes sense to specifically call out flooring. I've added the parent company and adjusted the roads and self storage in your area, please check my work:
osm.org/node/9949257070

Also I notice your address is for the main road but a road named Calpooia Street is what actually goes to your front door, is that accurate? Is it also accurate that there's a gate people drive through to get to your location? Just checking to make sure people know how to find you! Thanks again.

Hi there thank you for adding your business to OSM! I've standardized the tags on your entry so that it's actually findable: OSM has a particular way of doing things that would make "Category: flooring" and "Street: SW Queen Ave, Building B" not show up. It looks to me like you're mainly offering your services in constructing countertops and remodeling floors rather than focusing on direct to consumer DIY materials? If so I think "craft=builder" is the closest tag for you, otherwise craft=flooring. The craft tag is for artisans, the shop tag is like probably shopping carts are involved (you'd be in a similar category as Home Depot or Ikea.) Finally Description is just a few words at most, it tends to get abused for SEO but pretend it's like a subtitle that actually takes up space on the rendered map cuz that's sometimes how it shows up: you wouldn't want a map where every McDonalds had their mission statement written out underneath! Thanks again and feel free to respond with any questions or concerns.

Thanks for your contributions! Please be aware that generally it's good to keep separate things separate: letting a forest and a road share nodes runs the risk of messing up one if the other is changed, and can also create frustration when someone wants to add a sidewalk or house or ditch in between the road and forest. Best to keep things separated unless we really intend to say they're connected (like the difference between a bridge over a railroad vs a same-level railroad crossing.)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124618555

Hi I apologize I was mistaken. You added a new road to Hoffman Road, but it's not your fault that Hoffman Road is connected to the city limits boundary and showed up as changed in OsmCha. I'll try to be more careful when reviewing next time.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121923706

Hi there! When you added these roads you connected a road to an administrative boundary. This isn't good because then if the city limits move or the road moves the other is erroneously affected. Can you edit this to disconnect the two?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121923706

Thank you for your contributions! Do you think the aerial imagery looks like this parking lot connects to Triple Tree Circle North? If so, we should connect it, if not, a noexit=yes tag on the end node will prevent validation warnings.

Yep! Actually it looks like it had been merged with a residential landuse. Fixed.

You moved node 7454902970
to make the sidewalk follow the train tracks instead of the road, is this accurate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118269302