Disconnected cart paths generate warnings, but if it's the best representation we have of the reality on the ground then that's what we've got to work with. If you find an official map of the course or know where carts are supposed to go, connecting them can be great, otherwise there's no problem with how they currently are.

The reason to not connect stuff is, if you move one it affects the other. So i.e. I expanded the course to fit the features, and bits of sand trap and fairway were getting pulled with it.

Hi there! Do we know what this feature is? It looks like a parking lot, was named Dog Park until recently, and is tagged as a car rental business...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111210535

Thanks for your contributions! Be sure to not connect features together unless they're truly physically connected in the real world: I separated out the golf course boundary from the fairways and cart paths. Also feel free to expand the boundaries to match the map: the eastern third of the mapped course was outside the boundary so I expanded the boundary. Finally, for any kind of GPS to work paths need to be connected even if it doesn't 100% match up to the aerial image, so I connected some cart paths to the parking lot and each other. There were some cart paths along the southern edge that I couldn't tell how they connected, but if there is a preferred path network it'd be a good idea to fully map that in case any golfers use GPS to get around.

Thanks again!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111146762

Gotcha ok. I'll have to look closer, many area roads have speeds listed but no signs in sight. Thanks!

Hiya! I'm auditing speed limits in Salem. Can I ask what the source of these speed limits were? I'm having trouble actually finding many speed limit signs downtown for example.

Gotcha. The legal access is via Northwest Fair Oaks Drive, right? There were some trails up there that were overlapping but not actually connected so I connected them.

Ok! I just edited the boundary based on city GIS data which is presumably as accurate as it'll get.

Ok thanks! Amazon (#amap) added them likely because they were necessary to deliver a package, so I'll re-add them but mark them as private so that any decent GPS app will not suggest using it. (We shouldn't delete things that exist, because they'll just be treated as missing and re-added later, rather we can just tag them appropriately to match reality.)

Is there any way of accessing the MiLK trail from the west side? Maybe Kestrel Hill Ln or Windsor Place or Grandview Dr? Or is it just a single entrance loop off Fair Oaks Dr?

Hi there! Thanks for your contributions. I see you modified the city limits here, were you using an authoritative source for that boundary or just following the forest?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81847127

Hiya thanks for your contributions! In this changeset it looks like you adjusted the boundaries of the OSU forest, but also modified the city limits (Corvallis administrative boundary) in the process. Was this intentional?

Just to confirm, when you deleted these driveways was it because you were physically there and know there is no passable road here? Usually #amap is pretty okay about noting roads where they exist. If you just think people shouldn't walk or drive down the path, but a path does exist, then there's other ways of tagging that.

Thanks again for your contributions!

(link) https://imgur.com/a/Jt8oIbU

It looks like you did a bunch of good work mapping a new trail! I think I see the problem and I'll take care of it. Here's the correct border in red according to the newest TIGER census data, which means the city border hasn't been correct in a while ;) no worries!

In the future to prevent this just double check the list of changed things before you hit upload, and double-check what all is attached to stuff like landuses and roads at the edge of town cuz sometimes people (misguidedly?) merge them with administrative boundaries. Happy mapping!

I'm having trouble rewinding time to see exactly how the Corvallis border looked before, but some cached map tiles give us a hint: https://imgur.com/a/SYL32XA

I didn't change it back, maybe you can give an attempt. I like to use osmcha for viewing changesets (linked above) but you can also use this: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=110646759#19/44.58794/-123.31089 the deleted node was 454170749

Hey there, it looks like you edited the city border for Corvallis. Was this intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110646759

Thanks for your fixes today!

Heya! Osmose is whiny because relation 12657272 has only way 937890017 as outer with no inner, and a lot of these relation polygons are really just simple building parts that may not even be multipolygons in the first place. Any thoughts? I almost removed all the relations here but then I realized it'd be a major undertaking on mobile and I should ask you first.

Hi there, thanks for your contributions! Please only tag things as parking_aisle when it's an aisle solely for the purpose of parking in between one or more service roads, like you find in large lots outside "big box" stores. The main route into a parking lot, and main approach to a business, should just be a plain old service road.

Thanks again!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109363780

Hi there, North East Salem is not the name of a city.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108665255