=======================
I hereby accept the new ODbL licence for my contributions to the OSM database.
--oscarorbe
=======================
I have also clicked on the acceptance button while logged in.
OpenStreetMap
=======================
I hereby accept the new ODbL licence for my contributions to the OSM database.
--oscarorbe
=======================
I have also clicked on the acceptance button while logged in.
Discussion
Comentariu de stevage el 14 de January de 2011 a les 00:36
But do you understand and agree with the new Contributor Terms?
Comentariu de z-dude el 14 de January de 2011 a les 03:19
I also accepted it. I also selected the 'I consider my work to be public domain' option.
I'm ok with anyone using my uploaded data, and it doesn't matter if it's Google or some big corporation "making money".
I prefer the greater freedom of a totally free license.
The benefit to me is that my mountain bike trail can be routable on anyone's system, which benefits me as a mountain biker, because now, I can say 'Lets ride the Seymour Valley Trail' and a more open license lets that path be on more systems.
Comentariu de ALE! el 14 de January de 2011 a les 07:57
So and now you decided to tell everybody and to clog the blog?
Comentariu de Harry Wood el 14 de January de 2011 a les 10:33
Well there's certainly worse stuff "clogging the blog" (new users keep thinking it's a good place to ask questions)
I think at this stage the license working group would like to see people spread the word, and encourage others to click to accept. My understanding is that they're deliberately holding back on publicity, while making final tweaks the contributor terms. In the meantime why not support it with a diary entry?
Comentariu de HannesHH el 14 de January de 2011 a les 17:08
Because it is not a diary entry ranting about the new license or telling people to boycott it!
I have no clue what is supposed to go into "diary posts" and I do not see any way to abuse the system apart from spamming.
I fully support the new license and also (even more) the public domain.
Comentariu de chriscf el 14 de January de 2011 a les 18:47
It's nice to see something in the diary that mentions the licensing situation and isn't a lengthy diatribe on how the new terms are evil, OSMF are agents of Satan, and that tainted contributions debar you from pressing the magic button, etc. ad naus. (Coincidentally, this is why I refuse to subscribe to the mailing lists.)